Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rethinking Blood Eosinophils for Assessing Inhaled Corticosteroids Response in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis From the FLAME Trial

Alexander G Mathioudakis, Sebastian Bate, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Dave Singh, Jørgen Vestbo

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The varied treatment response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with COPD and the associated increased risk of pneumonia necessitate a personalized ICS therapeutic approach. This is informed by blood eosinophil count (BEC), which predicts ICS treatment response. However, BEC appears to change in response to ICS treatment.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does (1) BEC measured on ICS treatment (2) BEC measured off ICS treatment, or (3) the change in BEC during ICS treatment best predict treatment response to ICS in COPD?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Fluticasone Salmeterol on COPD Exacerbations Trial (FLAME), a 52-week, double-blind randomized controlled trial compared long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABAs)/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) with LABA/ICS. Corticosteroids were prohibited during a 4-week run-in period. We chose patients previously on ICS, thereby allowing BEC before and after the run-in period to represent BEC on and off ICS, respectively. In this post hoc analysis, we revisited outcome data, exploring how the three BEC biomarkers interacted with treatment response to the ICS-containing regimen.

RESULTS: Our study showed that LABA/LAMA combination was superior, or at least noninferior, to LABA/ICS in curbing exacerbations for most FLAME participants. However, higher BEC off ICS, higher BEC on ICS, and significant BEC suppression during ICS treatment corresponded to superior response to LABA/ICS in terms of exacerbation rate, time to first exacerbation, and time to first pneumonia. In a subgroup, including 9% of participants, BEC changed significantly during ICS treatment (≥ 200 cells/μL), and higher BEC on ICS did not predict ICS treatment response. For these patients, BEC off ICS and BEC change proved more predictive. Excess pneumonia risk associated with ICS appeared to be confined to patients who do not benefit from this treatment. BEC was not predictive of treatment effects on lung function and health status.

INTERPRETATION: This exploratory analysis advocates preferentially using BEC off ICS or BEC change during ICS treatment for guiding ICS treatment decisions. BEC measured on ICS is less predictive of treatment response.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01782326; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Original languageEnglish
JournalChest
Volume166
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)987-997
Number of pages11
ISSN0012-3692
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy
  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Female
  • Male
  • Eosinophils
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Middle Aged
  • Aged
  • Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/administration & dosage
  • Leukocyte Count
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage
  • Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage
  • Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage
  • Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination/administration & dosage
  • Biomarkers/blood
  • blood eosinophil count
  • eosinophils
  • precision medicine
  • clinical trials
  • COPD
  • inhaled corticosteroids

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Blood Eosinophils for Assessing Inhaled Corticosteroids Response in COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis From the FLAME Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this