Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Respiratory influence on left atrial volume calculation with 3D-echocardiography

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Total average diastolic longitudinal displacement by colour tissue doppler imaging as an assessment of diastolic function

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Atrial fibrillation in aortic stenosis--echocardiographic assessment and prognostic importance

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Predictors of right ventricular function as measured by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in heart failure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Women with coronary microvascular dysfunction and no obstructive coronary artery disease have reduced exercise capacity

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Coronary plaque composition assessed by cardiac computed tomography using adaptive Hounsfield unit thresholds

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Left atrial volume (LAV) estimation with 3D echocardiography has been shown to be more accurate than 2D volume calculation. However, little is known about the possible effect of respiratory movements on the accuracy of the measurement.

METHODS: 100 consecutive patients admitted with chest pain were examined with 3D echocardiography and LAV was quantified during inspiratory breath hold, expiratory breath hold and during free breathing.

RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, only 65 had an echocardiographic window that allowed for 3D echocardiography in the entire respiratory cycle. Mean atrial end diastolic volume was 45.4 ± 14.5 during inspiratory breath hold, 46.4 ± 14.8 during expiratory breath hold and 45.6 ± 14.3 during free respiration. Mean end systolic volume was 17.6 ± 7.8 during inspiratory breath hold, 18.8 ± 8.0 during expiratory breath hold and 18.3 ± 8.0 during free respiration. No significant differences were seen in any of the measured parameters.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study adds to the feasibility of 3D LAV quantitation. LAV estimation by 3D echocardiography may be performed during either end-expiratory or end-inspiratory breath-hold without any significant difference in the calculated volume. Also, the LAV estimation may be performed during free breathing.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCardiovascular Ultrasound
Volume14
Pages (from-to)11
ISSN1476-7120
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Artifacts, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional, Female, Heart Atria, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Male, Middle Aged, Motion, Organ Size, Reproducibility of Results, Respiratory Mechanics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Journal Article

ID: 49149635