Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Representativeness in population-based studies: a detailed description of non-response in a Danish cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Estimates of prediabetes and undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in Denmark: The end of an epidemic or a diagnostic artefact?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. A three-year national follow-up study on the development of community-level cancer rehabilitation in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Role of disease and demographic factors as determinants of return migration: A nationwide register-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Temporal relations between atrial fibrillation and ischaemic stroke and their prognostic impact on mortality

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The unifying diagnostic construct of bodily distress syndrome (BDS) was confirmed in the general population

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Adverse life events in the general population - a validation of the cumulative lifetime adversity measure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Decreasing rates of participation in population-based studies increasingly challenge the interpretation of study results, in both analytic and descriptive epidemiology. Consequently, estimates of possible differences between participants and non-participants are increasingly important for the interpretation of study results and generalization to the background population.

METHODS: An age-specific, population-based cohort of 1,198 individuals was examined at age 40, 45, 51, and 60. Participants were compared with non-participants and when possible also with the background population using a wide range of detailed information on somatic and mental health collected at each examination, including data from a clinical examination, biochemical measurements, questionnaires, interviews, and public registers.

RESULTS: Participation rates were higher than 80% at examinations at age 40, 45, and 51, but decreased to 65% at age 60. At the baseline investigation at age 40, analyses indicated that participants were representative of the cohort as well as the background population. However, the mortality rate was higher among non-participants in the succeeding 20 years. Among living cohort members at the 60-year examination, non-participants had lower socioeconomic status, higher hospitalization rate, and a worse overall health profile than participants.

CONCLUSIONS: The detailed data presented reinforce the contention that the health profile of non-participants is typically worse than that of participants. The results also indicate that while data from public registers give easily accessible information about non-participants, these crude proxy measures of health may not be enough to document representativeness.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Public Health
Volume34
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)623-31
Number of pages9
ISSN1403-4948
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Research areas

  • Adult, Cohort Studies, Data Collection, Denmark, Epidemiologic Methods, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Population Surveillance, Prospective Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

ID: 49837927