Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Repetitive and forceful movements of the hand as predictors of treatment for pain in the distal upper extremities

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet B radiation and risk of subtypes of breast cancer in Danish women

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Exposure to cholinesterase inhibiting insecticides and blood glucose level in a population of Ugandan smallholder farmers

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Wearing Occlusive Gloves Increases the Density of Staphylococcus aureus in Patients with Hand Eczema

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

  2. Chronic productive cough and inhalant occupational exposure-a study of the general population

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To investigate repetitive movements and the use of hand force as causes of treatment for distal upper extremities musculoskeletal disorders METHODS: A cohort of 202 747 workers in a pension health scheme from 2005 to 2017 in one of 17 jobs (eg, office work, carpentry, cleaning) was formed. Representative electro-goniometric measurements of wrist angular velocity as a measure for repetition and expert-rated use of hand force were used in a job exposure matrix (JEM). Job titles were retrieved from the Danish registers. Outcome was first treatment in the distal upper extremities. In a Poisson regression model, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of treatment were adjusted for age, calendar-year, diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and arm fractures. In further analyses, wrist velocity or hand force was added.

RESULTS: In men, wrist velocity had an IRR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.91) when the highest exposure level was compared with the lowest but with no clear exposure-response pattern. The effect became insignificant when adjusted for hand force. Hand force had an IRR of 2.65 (95% CI 2.13 to 3.29) for the highest versus the lowest exposure with an exposure-response pattern, which remained after adjustment for wrist velocity. Among women, no increased risk was found for hand force, while wrist velocity showed a significantly protective association with treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: In men, occupational exposure to hand force more than doubled the risk of seeking treatment. The results for exposure to repetition were less clear. In women, we could not find any indications of an increased risk neither for force nor for repetition.

Original languageEnglish
JournalOccupational and Environmental Medicine
ISSN1351-0711
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

ID: 68413818