Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Reliability validity and responsiveness of the spinal cord independence measure 4th version in a multicultural setup

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Differences in Acute Metabolic Responses to Bionic and Nonbionic Ambulation in Spinal Cord Injured Humans and Controls

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The Association between Social Engagement, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Falls among Older Primary Care Patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Harmonization of Databases: A Step for Advancing the Knowledge About Spinal Cord Injury

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. An observational study on body mass index during rehabilitation and follow-up in people with spinal cord injury in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Survival, discharge destination, and referral for rehabilitation after metastatic spinal cord compression surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Participation and quality of life in persons living with spinal cord injury in Norway

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. The Danish Spinal Cord Injury Shoulder (DanSCIS) cohort: methodology and primary results

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Amiram Catz
  • Malka Itzkovich
  • Keren Elkayam
  • Dianne Michaeli
  • Ilana Gelernter
  • Yoav Benjamini
  • Harvinder Singh Chhabra
  • Luigi Tesio
  • Einat Engel-Haber
  • Emiliana Bizzarini
  • Claudio Pilati
  • Giulio Del Popolo
  • Ilaria Baroncini
  • Nan Liu
  • Paulo Margalho
  • Thabata Pasquini Soeira
  • Bobeena Chandy
  • Mrinal Joshi
  • Jean-Francois Lemay
  • Dorothyann Curran
  • Annelie Schedin Leiulfsrud
  • Linda Sørensen
  • Fin Biering-Sorensen
  • Nur Kesiktas
  • Aheed Osman
  • Vadim Bluvshtein
View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To examine the fourth version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure for reliability and validity.

DESIGN: Partly blinded comparison with the criterion standard Spinal Cord Independence Measure III, and between examiners and examinations.

SETTING: A multicultural cohort from 19 spinal cord injury units in 11 countries.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 648 patients with spinal cord injury.

INTERVENTION: Assessment with Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM IV) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) on admission to inpatient rehabilitation and before discharge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SCIM IV interrater reliability, internal consistency, correlation with and difference from SCIM III, and responsiveness.

RESULTS: Total agreement between examiners was above 80% on most SCIM IV tasks. All Kappa coefficients were above 0.70 and statistically significant (P<.001). Pearson's coefficients of the correlation between the examiners were above 0.90, and intraclass correlation coefficients were above 0.90. Cronbach's alpha was above 0.96 for the entire SCIM IV, above 0.66 for the subscales, and usually decreased when an item was eliminated. Reliability values were lower for the subscale of respiration and sphincter management, and on admission than at discharge. SCIM IV and SCIM III mean values were very close, and the coefficients of Pearson correlation between them were 0.91-0.96 (P<.001). The responsiveness of SCIM IV was not significantly different from that of SCIM III in most of the comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS: The validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SCIM IV, which was adjusted to assess specific patient conditions or situations that SCIM III does not address, and which includes more accurate definitions of certain scoring criteria, are very good and quite similar to those of SCIM III. SCIM IV can be used for clinical and research trials, including international multi-center studies, and its group scores can be compared with those of SCIM III.

Original languageEnglish
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN0003-9993
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

ID: 69208556