Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Reliability of stress radiography in the assessment of coronal laxity following total knee arthroplasty

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Assessment of objective dynamic knee joint control in anterior cruciate ligament deficient and reconstructed individuals

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Knee extensor strength and hop test performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Failure modes of patellofemoral arthroplasty-registries vs. clinical studies: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Mismatch 'never events' in hip and knee arthroplasty: a cohort and intervention study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Stress radiography is used in the valuation of soft tissue laxity following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, reliability and agreement is largely unknown.

METHODS: In this prospective reliability study, we included 15 participants with prior TKA. Standardized coronal stress radiographs were obtained in both extension and flexion and with both varus and valgus stress. All radiographs were repeated (test-retest). In extension the Telos stress device was used, and flexion radiographs were obtained using the epicondylar-view. Three independent raters measured angulation between femoral and tibial component from all radiographs. Reliability was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and agreement visualized with Bland-Altman plots and by mean difference and limits of agreement (LOA).

RESULTS: Stress radiography in extension showed excellent reliability with ICC = 0.96 (0.95-0.98) and LOA of ±1.2°. Stress radiography at 80-90° of flexion showed good to excellent reliability when measuring medial laxity with ICC = 0.94 (0.89-0.97) and LOA of ±1.7°; however, when measuring lateral laxity the reliability was only moderate to good with ICC = 0.70 (0.51-0.84) and LOA of ±6.3°.

CONCLUSION: Stress radiography is clinically applicable and the methods described in this study provide excellent reliability for measurement of laxity in extension. The reliability of measurements in flexion is good to excellent when measuring medial laxity but only moderate to good when measuring lateral laxity.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Knee
Volume27
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)221-228
Number of pages8
ISSN0968-0160
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

ID: 59433280