Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The criterion validity of the sphygmomanometer was evaluated, relative to the Force Frame strength testing system. Test-retest reliability was assessed for both hip adduction and abduction strength.
DESIGN: Test-retest reliability study and criterion validity study.
PARTICIPANTS: 50 asymptomatic, field-sport athletes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maximal isometric hip adduction and abduction strength were measured. Interclass correlation coefficient(ICC2,1) with confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate reliability of peak strength values. A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient(r) was calculated to examine criterion validity of the sphygmomanometer as a measure of force when compared to the ForceFrame.
RESULTS: Intra-rater reliability for bilateral adduction testing using both ForceFrame and sphygmomanometer values revealed good-excellent reliability for both the 0° (ICC2.1 = 0.87-0.90) and 45° (ICC2.1 = 0.81-0.91) positions. ForceFrame values revealed good-excellent reliability for 0° abduction position and 45° abduction position. A good-moderate relationship (Pearson's r = 0.63) for 0° adduction position, and poor relationship (Pearson's r = 0.40) for 45° adduction position, were found between adduction squeeze values on ForceFrame and sphygmomanometer.
CONCLUSION: Excellent reliability in hip adduction squeeze strength testing for both modes. However, there exists a 'good to moderate'-'fair' relationship between the Force Frame and sphygmomanometer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine |
| Volume | 59 |
| Pages (from-to) | 162-167 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISSN | 1466-853X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
Keywords
- Groin injuries
- Hip Adduction:Abduction ratio
- Hip injuries
- Squeeze test