Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during emergency calls - a systematic review of observational studies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. First-response treatment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a survey of current practices across 29 countries in Europe

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The Danish prehospital emergency healthcare system and research possibilities

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients - consensus and evidence based

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Patient experience of spinal immobilisation after trauma

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Occurrence of shockable rhythm in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest over time: a report from the COSTA group

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Utstein recommendation for emergency stroke care

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: incidence and survival - a nationwide study of regions in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: The medical dispatcher plays an essential role as part of the first link in the Chain of Survival, by recognising the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) during the emergency call, dispatching the appropriate first responder or emergency medical services response, performing dispatcher assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and referring to the nearest automated external defibrillator. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and compare studies reporting recognition of OHCA patients during emergency calls.

METHODS: This systematic review was reported in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library on 4 November 2015. Observational studies, reporting the proportion of clinically confirmed OHCAs that was recognised during the emergency call, were included. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text articles for inclusion. Data were extracted and the risk of bias within studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool for quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

RESULTS: A total of 3,180 abstracts were screened for eligibility and 53 publications were assessed in full-text. We identified 16 studies including 6,955 patients that fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. The studies reported recognition of OHCA with a median sensitivity of 73.9% (range: 14.1-96.9%). The selection of study population and the definition of "recognised OHCA" (threshold for positive test) varied greatly between the studies, resulting in high risk of bias. Heterogeneity in the studies precluded meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION: Among the 16 included studies, we found a median sensitivity for OHCA recognition of 73.9% (range: 14.1-96.9%). However, great heterogeneity between study populations and in the definition of "recognised OHCA", lead to insufficient comparability of results. Uniform and transparent reporting is required to ensure comparability and development towards best practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Volume25
Issue number1
Number of pages9
ISSN1757-7241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article, Review

ID: 49950054