Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial

Leen Verleye, Petronella B Ottevanger, Gunnar B Kristensen, Tom Ehlen, Nick Johnson, Maria E L van der Burg, Nick S Reed, René H M Verheijen, Katja N Gaarenstroom, Berit Mosgaard, Jose Miguel Seoane, Jacobus van der Velden, Robert Lotocki, Winette van der Graaf, Björn Penninckx, Corneel Coens, Gavin Stuart, Ignace Vergote

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the quality of surgical pathology reports of advanced stage ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer. This quality assurance project was performed within the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 study comparing primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume47
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)57-64
Number of pages8
ISSN0959-8049
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Data Collection
  • Female
  • Health Facility Size
  • Humans
  • Medical Audit
  • Medical Records
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Pathology, Clinical
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of pathology reports for advanced ovarian cancer: are we missing essential information? An audit of 479 pathology reports from the EORTC-GCG 55971/NCIC-CTG OV13 neoadjuvant trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this