Quality control of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging segmentation, feature tracking, aortic flow, and native T1 analysis using automated batch processing in the UK Biobank study

Sucharitha Chadalavada, Elisa Rauseo, Ahmed Salih, Hafiz Naderi, Mohammed Khanji, Jose D Vargas, Aaron M Lee, Alborz Amir-Kalili, Lisette Lockhart, Ben Graham, Mihaela Chirvasa, Kenneth Fung, Jose Paiva, Mihir M Sanghvi, Gregory G Slabaugh, Magnus T Jensen, Nay Aung, Steffen E Petersen

Abstract

AIMS: Automated algorithms are regularly used to analyse cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. Validating data output reliability from this method is crucial for enabling widespread adoption. We outline a visual quality control (VQC) process for image analysis using automated batch processing. We assess the performance of automated analysis and the reliability of replacing visual checks with statistical outlier (SO) removal approach in UK Biobank CMR scans.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 1987 CMR scans from the UK Biobank COVID-19 imaging study. We used batch processing software (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc.-CVI42) to automatically extract chamber volumetric data, strain, native T1, and aortic flow data. The automated analysis outputs (∼62 000 videos and 2000 images) were visually checked by six experienced clinicians using a standardized approach and a custom-built R Shiny app. Inter-observer variability was assessed. Data from scans passing VQC were compared with a SO removal QC method in a subset of healthy individuals (n = 1069). Automated segmentation was highly rated, with over 95% of scans passing VQC. Overall inter-observer agreement was very good (Gwet's AC2 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.84, 0.94). No difference in overall data derived from VQC or SO removal in healthy individuals was observed.

CONCLUSION: Automated image analysis using CVI42 prototypes for UK Biobank CMR scans demonstrated high quality. Larger UK Biobank data sets analysed using these automated algorithms do not require in-depth VQC. SO removal is sufficient as a QC measure, with operator discretion for visual checks based on population or research objectives.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice
Volume2
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)qyae094
ISSN2755-9637
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality control of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging segmentation, feature tracking, aortic flow, and native T1 analysis using automated batch processing in the UK Biobank study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this