Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men Unfit for Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Disseminated Bartonella henselae Infection Visualized by [18F]FDG-PET/CT and MRI

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings in Cytomegalovirus Colitis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Four Virtual-Reality Simulators for Diagnostic Abdominal Ultrasound Training in Radiology

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Non-Invasive Assessment of Intravascular Pressure Gradients: A Review of Current and Proposed Novel Methods

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  5. Very Early Response Evaluation by PET/MR in Patients with Lung Cancer-Timing and Feasibility

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Active Surveillance Versus Radical Prostatectomy in Favorable-risk Localized Prostate Cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Risk of cardiovascular events in men treated for prostate cancer compared with prostate cancer-free men

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. 5hmC Level Predicts Biochemical Failure Following Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients with ERG Negative Tumors

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Nearly one in three men develop lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and 10% clinically progress despite medication. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the reference standard for symptoms refractory to medical treatment. However, some patients cannot tolerate TURP for medical (e.g., comorbidity) or technical (e.g., large prostate) reasons. This study estimated the safety and effect of prostate artery embolization (PAE) in men unfit for surgery. A prospective, single-centre trial including men with LUTS or urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who were unfit for surgery. The primary objective was to treat urinary retention and LUTS. Outcome measures included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (IPSS-QoL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5), prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), peak void flow (Qmax), post-void residual (PVR), and complications. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Eleven consecutive patients with a mean age of 75.2 (SD ± 8.2) underwent PAE. Catheter removal was successful in 60%. IPSS-QoL improved 4.5 points (95% CI: -5.6; -3.4), and PV was reduced by 26.2 cm3 (95% CI: -50.9; -2.3). None of the remaining outcomes changed. No major complications occurred. PAE was effective and safe for LUTS and urinary retention associated with BPH in men unfit for surgery.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDiagnostics
Volume9
Issue number2
Number of pages9
ISSN2075-4418
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Apr 2019

ID: 57104007