TY - JOUR
T1 - PROPOSe
T2 - A Real-life Prospective Study of Proclarix, a Novel Blood-based Test to Support Challenging Biopsy Decision-making in Prostate Cancer
AU - Steuber, Thomas
AU - Heidegger, Isabel
AU - Kafka, Mona
AU - Roeder, Martin A
AU - Chun, Felix
AU - Preisser, Felix
AU - Palisaar, Rein-Jüri
AU - Hanske, Julian
AU - Budaeus, Lars
AU - Schiess, Ralph
AU - Keller, Thomas
AU - Semjonow, Axel
AU - Hammerer, Peter
AU - Manka, Lukas
AU - Ecke, Thorsten
AU - Schwentner, Christian
AU - Ohlmann, Carsten
N1 - Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer (PCa) often leads to negative biopsy results or detection of clinically insignificant PCa, more frequently in the PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml, in men with increased prostate volume and normal digital rectal examination (DRE).OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the accuracy of Proclarix, a novel blood-based diagnostic test, to help in biopsy decision-making in this challenging patient population.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Ten clinical sites prospectively enrolled 457 men presenting for prostate biopsy with PSA between 2 and 10 ng/ml, normal DRE, and prostate volume ≥35 cm3. Transrectal ultrasound-guided and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided biopsy techniques were allowed.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Serum samples were tested blindly at the end of the study. Diagnostic performance of Proclarix risk score was established in correlation to systematic biopsy outcome and its performance compared with %free PSA (%fPSA) and the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator (RC) as well as Proclarix density compared with PSA density in men undergoing mpMRI.RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The sensitivity of Proclarix risk score for clinically significant PCa (csPCa) defined as grade group (GG) ≥2 was 91% (n = 362), with higher specificity than both %fPSA (22% vs 14%; difference = 8% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.6-14%], p = 0.005) and RC (22% vs 15%; difference = 7% [95% CI, 0.7-12%], p = 0.028). In the subset of men undergoing mpMRI-fusion biopsy (n = 121), the specificity of Proclarix risk score was significantly higher than PSA density (26% vs 8%; difference = 18% [95% CI, 7-28%], p < 0.001), and at equal sensitivity of 97%, Proclarix density had an even higher specificity of 33% [95% CI, 23-43%].CONCLUSIONS: In a routine use setting, Proclarix accurately discriminated csPCa from no or insignificant PCa in the most challenging patients. Proclarix represents a valuable rule-out test in the diagnostic algorithm for PCa, alone or in combination with mpMRI.PATIENT SUMMARY: Proclarix is a novel blood-based test with the potential to accurately rule out clinically significant prostate cancer, and therefore to reduce the number of unneeded biopsies.
AB - BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer (PCa) often leads to negative biopsy results or detection of clinically insignificant PCa, more frequently in the PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml, in men with increased prostate volume and normal digital rectal examination (DRE).OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the accuracy of Proclarix, a novel blood-based diagnostic test, to help in biopsy decision-making in this challenging patient population.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Ten clinical sites prospectively enrolled 457 men presenting for prostate biopsy with PSA between 2 and 10 ng/ml, normal DRE, and prostate volume ≥35 cm3. Transrectal ultrasound-guided and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided biopsy techniques were allowed.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Serum samples were tested blindly at the end of the study. Diagnostic performance of Proclarix risk score was established in correlation to systematic biopsy outcome and its performance compared with %free PSA (%fPSA) and the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator (RC) as well as Proclarix density compared with PSA density in men undergoing mpMRI.RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The sensitivity of Proclarix risk score for clinically significant PCa (csPCa) defined as grade group (GG) ≥2 was 91% (n = 362), with higher specificity than both %fPSA (22% vs 14%; difference = 8% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.6-14%], p = 0.005) and RC (22% vs 15%; difference = 7% [95% CI, 0.7-12%], p = 0.028). In the subset of men undergoing mpMRI-fusion biopsy (n = 121), the specificity of Proclarix risk score was significantly higher than PSA density (26% vs 8%; difference = 18% [95% CI, 7-28%], p < 0.001), and at equal sensitivity of 97%, Proclarix density had an even higher specificity of 33% [95% CI, 23-43%].CONCLUSIONS: In a routine use setting, Proclarix accurately discriminated csPCa from no or insignificant PCa in the most challenging patients. Proclarix represents a valuable rule-out test in the diagnostic algorithm for PCa, alone or in combination with mpMRI.PATIENT SUMMARY: Proclarix is a novel blood-based test with the potential to accurately rule out clinically significant prostate cancer, and therefore to reduce the number of unneeded biopsies.
KW - Humans
KW - Image-Guided Biopsy/methods
KW - Male
KW - Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Prostate-Specific Antigen
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123218631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.003
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33422560
VL - 5
SP - 321
EP - 327
JO - European urology oncology
JF - European urology oncology
SN - 2588-9311
IS - 3
ER -