Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Prophylactic use of acid suppressants in adult acutely ill hospitalised patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review


  1. A marking of the cricothyroid membrane with extended neck returns to correct position after neck manipulation and repositioning

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Association between transfusion of blood products and acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Hypoxemia following hospital discharge after fast-track hip- and knee arthroplasty-a prospective observational study subanalysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Ketamine for rapid sequence intubation in adult trauma patients: A retrospective observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Acutely ill patients are at risk of stress-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and prophylactic acid suppressants are frequently used. In this systematic review, we assessed the effects of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) versus placebo or no prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalised patients.

METHODS: We conducted the review according to the PRISMA statement, the Cochrane Handbook and GRADE, using conventional meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, clinically important GI bleeding and serious adverse events (SAEs). The primary analyses included overall low risk of bias trials.

RESULTS: We included 65 comparisons from 62 trials (n = 9713); 43 comparisons were from intensive care units. Only three trials (n = 3596) had overall low risk of bias. We did not find an effect on all-cause mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.14; TSA-adjusted CI 0.90 to 1.18; high certainty). The rate of clinically important GI bleeding was lower with SUP (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.89; TSA-adjusted CI 0.14 to 2.81; moderate certainty). We did not find a difference in pneumonia rates (moderate certainty). Effects on SAEs, Clostridium difficile enteritis, myocardial ischaemia and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were inconclusive due to sparse data. Analyses of all trials regardless of risk of bias were consistent with the primary analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a difference in all-cause mortality or pneumonia with SUP. The incidence of clinically important GI bleeding was reduced with SUP, whereas any effects on SAEs, myocardial ischaemia, Clostridium difficile enteritis and HRQoL were inconclusive.

STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42017055676; published study protocol: Marker, et al 2017 in Systematic Reviews.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)714-728
Number of pages15
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

© 2020 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Research areas

  • acid suppressants, adverse effects, gastrointestinal bleeding, histamine-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, stress ulcer prophylaxis

ID: 59361920