Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular non-seminoma: A nationwide, population-based cohort study

Thomas Wagner*, Birgitte Grønkær Toft, Jakob Lauritsen, Mikkel Bandak, Ib Jarle Christensen, Birte Engvad, Michael Kreiberg, Mads Agerbæk, Lars Dysager, Andreas Carus, Josephine Julie Rosenvilde, Daniel Berney, Gedske Daugaard

*Corresponding author for this work
19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 30% of patients with clinical stage I non-seminoma (CSI-NS) relapse. Current risk stratification is based on lymphovascular invasion (LVI) alone. The extent to which additional tumor characteristics can improve risk prediction remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most important prognostic factors for relapse in CSI-NS patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based cohort study including all patients with CSI-NS diagnosed in Denmark between 2013 and 2018 with follow-up until 2022. Patients were identified in the prospective Danish Testicular Cancer database. By linkage to the Danish National Pathology Registry, histological slides from the orchiectomy specimens were retrieved.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Histological slides were reviewed blinded to the clinical outcome. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. The association between prespecified potential prognostic factors and relapse was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated by discrimination (Harrell's C-index) and calibration.

RESULTS: Of 453 patients included, 139 patients (30.6%) relapsed during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Tumor invasion into the hilar soft tissue of the testicular hilum, tumor size, LVI and embryonal carcinoma were independent predictors of relapse. The estimated 5-year risk of relapse ranged from < 5% to > 85%, depending on the number of risk factors. After internal model validation, the model had an overall concordance statistic of 0.75. Model calibration was excellent.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The identified prognostic factors provide a much more accurate risk stratification than current clinical practice, potentially aiding clinical decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114025
JournalEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Volume202
ISSN0959-8049
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2024

Keywords

  • Clinical stage I disease
  • Non-seminoma
  • Prognostic factors
  • Relapse
  • Risk prediction
  • Testicular cancer

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors for relapse in patients with clinical stage I testicular non-seminoma: A nationwide, population-based cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this