Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Processed meat intake and incidence of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  1. The implications of an aging population and increased obesity for knee arthroplasty rates in Sweden: a register-based study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Familial associations in hair cortisol concentration: A cross-sectional analysis based on the Healthy Start study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Vitamin D and Calcium Milk Fortification in Pregnant Women with Periodontitis: A Feasibility Trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

The objective was to use accumulated evidence to explore the association between processed meat intake and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and to investigate the reliability of associations by evaluating patterns of risk by study population characteristics and research quality parameters. We included 29 observational prospective cohort studies with relative risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals for CRC according to various levels of processed meat consumption. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Data sources were PubMed and Embase up to January 2017. The summary relative risks for high versus low processed meat consumption and risk of CRC, colon, and rectal cancer were 1.13 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.26), 1.19 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.31), and 1.21 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.49), respectively. Similar estimates were observed for the dose-response analyses. Heterogeneity across studies was detected in most analytical models. The overall judgment showed that two out of 29 studies had a moderate risk of bias, 25 had a serious risk of bias, and 2 had a critical risk of bias. The bias domains most often rated critical were bias due to risk of confounding, bias due to missing data, and selective outcome reporting bias. Although this meta-analysis indicates a modest association between processed meat intake and an increased risk of CRC, our assessment of internal validity warrants a cautious interpretation of these results, as most of the included studies were judged to have serious or critical risks of bias.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume74
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1132-1148
Number of pages17
ISSN0954-3007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2020

ID: 62314482