Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Process, content, and experiences of delivering the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) in the Danish specialised palliative care setting

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. The psychological symptom burden in partners of pancreatic cancer patients: a population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Patient ambassador support in newly diagnosed patients with acute leukemia during treatment: a feasibility study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Prevalence of cognitive impairment and its relation to mental health in Danish lymphoma survivors

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Establishing anchor-based minimally important differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 in glioma patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Characteristics of patients reporting symptoms by open-ended questions in specialist palliative care

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Determining minimal important change for the thyroid-related quality of life questionnaire ThyPRO

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: The Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool Intervention (CSNAT-I) has shown positive effects in the Danish specialised palliative care (SPC) setting. Here, we explore the process, content, and experiences of delivering the CSNAT-I.

METHODS: Data were collected during a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the impact of the CSNAT-I in the Danish SPC setting in 2018-2019. Data were obtained from the CSNAT (tool) completed by caregivers, from health care professionals' (HCPs') written documentation of the CSNAT-I, and from semi-structured interviews with HCPs.

RESULTS: The study population consisted of the 130 caregivers receiving a first CSNAT-I within 13 days of study enrolment, the 93 caregivers receiving a second CSNAT-I 15-27 days after enrolment, and the 44 HCPs delivering the intervention. Top three domains of unmet caregiver support needs reported in the CSNAT-I were: "knowing what to expect in the future," "dealing with feelings and worries," and "understanding the illness." These domains together with "knowing who to contact if concerned" and "talking to the patient about the illness" were also the domains most frequently prioritised for discussion with HCPs. According to HCPs, most often support delivered directly by HCPs themselves during the actual contact (e.g., listening, advice, information) was sufficient. Overall, HCPs experienced the CSNAT-I as constructive and meaningful, and difficulties in delivering the intervention were rarely an issue.

CONCLUSION: The support needs reported by caregivers confirm the relevance of the CSNAT-I. HCPs' overall experiences of the clinical feasibility and relevance of the CSNAT-I were very positive. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03466580. Date of registration: March 1, 2018.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN0941-4355
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Jul 2021

    Research areas

  • Caregivers, Intervention, Palliative care, Process evaluation, Support needs

ID: 67034349