Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Pressure Difference Estimation in Carotid Bulbs using Vector Flow Imaging - A Phantom Study

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

  1. History and Latest Advances in Flow Estimation Technology: From 1-D in 2-D to 3-D in 4-D

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Super-Resolution Ultrasound Imaging of Rat Kidneys before and after Ischemia-Reperfusion

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Tissue Motion Estimation and Correction in Super Resolution Imaging

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Vector Concentration used for Stenosis Assessment in the Carotid Artery before and after Carotid Stenting

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Elastografie in der Brustbildgebung

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Palliative Prostate Artery Embolization for Prostate Cancer: A Case Series

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Hypertension is a common health problem and may be caused by dysfunction of the stretch sensitive baroreceptors in the carotid bulb. Velocity changes and vortices are present in the carotid bulb, and a better evaluation of the local flow and pressures may be important to further understand hypertension. The intravascular pressure catheter is a common tool in the clinic and is currently considered to be the reference standard for intravascular pressure measurement, but the method is invasive, ionizing, and has been reported to be inaccurate. Vector flow imaging (VFI) is an angle independent, noninvasive, and nonionizing ultrasound method that can estimate pressure differences. In this study, pressure differences between the common carotid artery and the carotid bulb obtained with VFI were compared with catheter measurements in three carotid bifurcation phantoms. A fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation model was used as reference. Additionally, 10 repeated VFI and catheter measurements were performed in one phantom for a precision assessment. The mean absolute pressure difference between the catheter and FSI method in the three phantoms was 140.5 Pa, and 10 repeated catheter tests measured a mean pressure decrease with a large variation (mean: -133.3 Pa, SD: 786%). VFI estimated pressure increases in all phantoms with a mean standard deviation of 11.6%, and the mean absolute pressure difference compared with FSI was 16.7 Pa. Ten repeated VFI estimations found a mean pressure increase with low variation (mean: 40.1 Pa, SD: 10.9%). VFI precisely estimated small pressure differences in a carotid bifurcation phantom setup, whereas the fluid-filled pressure catheter measurements were imprecise.

Original languageEnglish
JournalIEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS
Pages (from-to)872-875
Number of pages4
ISSN1948-5719
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019
Event2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2019 - Glasgow, United Kingdom
Duration: 6 Oct 20199 Oct 2019

Conference

Conference2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2019
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityGlasgow
Period06/10/201909/10/2019

Event

2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium, IUS 2019

06/10/201909/10/2019

Glasgow, United Kingdom

Event: Conference

    Research areas

  • carotid bifurcation, fluid-filled pressure catheter, fluid-structure interaction simulation, phantom study, Pressure difference estimation, vector flow imaging

ID: 59134175