TY - JOUR
T1 - Preoperative Psychopharmacological Treatment is Not a Risk factor for Poorer Patient-Reported Improvements 12 months After Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
T2 - A Multicenter Registry-Based Cohort study of 7,247 Procedures
AU - Kornvig, Simon
AU - Kehlet, Henrik
AU - Jørgensen, Christoffer Calov
AU - Fink-Jensen, Anders
AU - Videbech, Poul
AU - Jakobsen, Thomas
AU - Gromov, Kirill
AU - Varnum, Claus
N1 - Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2024/10/15
Y1 - 2024/10/15
N2 - BACKGROUND: Preoperative psychopharmacological treatment (PPT) has been associated with increased hospital length of stay and readmission rate after hip and knee arthroplasty. However, little is known regarding the association between PPT and improvements in patient-reported outcomes postoperatively in a multicenter fast-track setting. Thus, the primary objective was to investigate whether PPT is a risk factor for poorer patient-reported improvements 12 months after surgery. Secondary objectives included assessment of additional time points and subgroups of PPT.METHODS: This multicenter registry-based cohort study included 4,021 primary hip and 3,226 primary knee arthroplasties performed from 2016 to 2020 at three fast-track departments in Denmark due to primary osteoarthritis. The Oxford Hip Score/Oxford Knee Score (OHS/OKS), EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels/EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels, and EuroQol visual analog scale were collected at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Exposure status was assigned using the Danish National Prescription Registry. Marginal mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multilevel Tobit regression and adjusted for age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index obtained from the Danish National Patient Register.RESULTS: No associations were found between PPT and improvements in OHS (MD -0.5, CI -1.4 to 0.4) or OKS (MD -0.3, CI -1.2 to 0.5) after 12 months. However, PPT was associated with lower baseline OHS (MD -1.4, CI -2.2 to -0.6) and OKS (MD -2.1, CI -2.9 to -1.3), and 12 months follow-up OHS (MD -1.9, CI -2.8 to -1.1) and OKS (MD -2.4, CI -3.2 to -1.6). Similar findings were observed at other time points, using EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels/EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels or EuroQol visual analog scale, and when evaluating PPT subgroups.CONCLUSIONS: In hip and knee arthroplasty, PPT was not a risk factor for poorer patient-reported improvements 12 months after surgery. However, PPT was associated with marginally poorer baseline and follow-up scores. Thus, arthroplasties remain effective treatments despite PPT from a patient-centered perspective.
AB - BACKGROUND: Preoperative psychopharmacological treatment (PPT) has been associated with increased hospital length of stay and readmission rate after hip and knee arthroplasty. However, little is known regarding the association between PPT and improvements in patient-reported outcomes postoperatively in a multicenter fast-track setting. Thus, the primary objective was to investigate whether PPT is a risk factor for poorer patient-reported improvements 12 months after surgery. Secondary objectives included assessment of additional time points and subgroups of PPT.METHODS: This multicenter registry-based cohort study included 4,021 primary hip and 3,226 primary knee arthroplasties performed from 2016 to 2020 at three fast-track departments in Denmark due to primary osteoarthritis. The Oxford Hip Score/Oxford Knee Score (OHS/OKS), EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels/EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels, and EuroQol visual analog scale were collected at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Exposure status was assigned using the Danish National Prescription Registry. Marginal mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multilevel Tobit regression and adjusted for age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index obtained from the Danish National Patient Register.RESULTS: No associations were found between PPT and improvements in OHS (MD -0.5, CI -1.4 to 0.4) or OKS (MD -0.3, CI -1.2 to 0.5) after 12 months. However, PPT was associated with lower baseline OHS (MD -1.4, CI -2.2 to -0.6) and OKS (MD -2.1, CI -2.9 to -1.3), and 12 months follow-up OHS (MD -1.9, CI -2.8 to -1.1) and OKS (MD -2.4, CI -3.2 to -1.6). Similar findings were observed at other time points, using EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels/EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels or EuroQol visual analog scale, and when evaluating PPT subgroups.CONCLUSIONS: In hip and knee arthroplasty, PPT was not a risk factor for poorer patient-reported improvements 12 months after surgery. However, PPT was associated with marginally poorer baseline and follow-up scores. Thus, arthroplasties remain effective treatments despite PPT from a patient-centered perspective.
KW - knee arthroplasty
KW - multicenter
KW - patient-reported outcome
KW - psychopharmacological treatment
KW - total hip arthroplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208473802&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.026
DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.026
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39419411
SN - 0883-5403
JO - The Journal of arthroplasty
JF - The Journal of arthroplasty
ER -