Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Prediction of IOI-HA scores using speech reception thresholds and speech discrimination scores in quiet

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Intertester reliability of the acceptable noise level

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Significant hearing loss in Fabry disease: Study of the Danish nationwide cohort prior to treatment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. A longitudinal evaluation of hearing and ventilation tube insertion in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Danish guidelines on management of otitis media in preschool children

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Prenatal exposure to persistent organic pollutants and offspring allergic sensitization and lung function at 20 years of age

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Outcome measures can be used to improve the quality of the rehabilitation by identifying and understanding which variables influence the outcome. This information can be used to improve outcomes for clients. In clinical practice, pure-tone audiometry, speech reception thresholds (SRTs), and speech discrimination scores (SDSs) in quiet or in noise are common assessments made prior to hearing aid (HA) fittings. It is not known whether SRT and SDS in quiet relate to HA outcome measured with the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between pure-tone average (PTA), SRT, and SDS in quiet and IOI-HA in both first-time and experienced HA users.

RESEARCH DESIGN: SRT and SDS were measured in a sample of HA users who also responded to the IOI-HA.

STUDY SAMPLE: Fifty-eight Danish-speaking adult HA users.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The psychometric properties were evaluated and compared to previous studies using the IOI-HA. The associations and differences between the outcome scores and a number of descriptive variables (age, gender, fitted monaurally/binaurally with HA, first-time/experienced HA users, years of HA use, time since last HA fitting, best ear PTA, best ear SRT, or best ear SDS) were examined. A multiple forward stepwise regression analysis was conducted using scores on the separate IOI-HA items, the global score, and scores on the introspection and interaction subscales as dependent variables to examine whether the descriptive variables could predict these outcome measures.

RESULTS: Scores on single IOI-HA items, the global score, and scores on the introspection (items 1, 2, 4, and 7) and interaction (items 3, 5, and 6) subscales closely resemble those previously reported. Multiple regression analysis showed that the best ear SDS predicts about 18-19% of the outcome on items 3 and 5 separately, and about 16% on the interaction subscale (sum of items 3, 5, and 6) CONCLUSIONS: The best ears SDS explains some of the variance displayed in the IOI-HA global score and the interaction subscale. The relation between SDS and IOI-HA suggests that a poor unaided SDS might in itself be a limiting factor for the HA rehabilitation efficacy and hence the IOI-HA outcome. The clinician could use this information to align the user's HA expectations to what is within possible reach.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Academy of Audiology. Journal
Volume25
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)154-63
Number of pages10
ISSN1050-0545
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Correction of Hearing Impairment, Female, Hearing Aids, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Patient Satisfaction, Predictive Value of Tests, Principal Component Analysis, Psychometrics, Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Speech Discrimination Tests, Speech Reception Threshold Test, Statistics, Nonparametric

ID: 44956395