Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Potential positive impact of group-based diabetes dialogue meetings on diabetes distress and glucose control in people with type 1 diabetes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. How participatory action research changed our view of the challenges of shared decision-making training

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Online communication in a rehabilitation setting: Experiences of patients with chronic conditions using a web portal in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Is diabetes self-management education still the Cinderella of diabetes care?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Patientś experiences of patient education on psychiatric inpatient wards; a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Whole blood co-expression modules associate with metabolic traits and type 2 diabetes: an IMI-DIRECT study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Barriers and enablers to providing psycho-social support for adults with new onset Type 1 diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

  3. Co-designing an Intervention for Adults with New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes to Improve Psychological and Social Adaptation

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference abstract in journalResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of group-based diabetes dialogue meetings (DDMs) on diabetes distress, perceived competence and glycaemic control.

METHODS: Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) were invited to DDMs with peers and healthcare professionals. The impact of participation was evaluated by change in diabetes distress measured by Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID), diabetes competence measured by Perceived Competence in Diabetes (PCD), change in HbA1c before and one year after the DDMs.

RESULTS: 120 patients with T1D participated in at least one DDM: 75% female, mean age 50 years (range 21-76), mean diabetes duration 23 years (range 0-64); 39% of all participants had a baseline PAID score≥33, indicating high levels of distress. After one year, both PAID (from 30.4±16.6 to 27.4±17.1; n=81, p=0.03), and mean HbA1c (61.6±10.2 to 58.8±9.9; n=120, p<0.0001) had improved significantly. PCD showed no change. Meanwhile, the benefit from participating was rated high with a median of four out of five and the major gain being the possibility to share experiences with peers.

CONCLUSION: Group-based DDMs were highly appreciated by participants and associated with significant improvements in diabetes distress and HbA1c.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: DDMs target a large group of patients using few staff resources.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume99
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)1978-1983
Number of pages6
ISSN0738-3991
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Group Processes, Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Patient Education as Topic, Peer Group, Self Care, Stress, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Journal Article

ID: 52073517