TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer and the association with endoscopic findings in the Danish colorectal cancer screening programme
AU - Rasmussen, Simon Ladefoged
AU - Pedersen, Lasse
AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian
AU - Rasmussen, Morten
AU - Bernstein, Inge
AU - Thorlacius-Ussing, Ole
N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2025/3/21
Y1 - 2025/3/21
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in Denmark, with a 5-year mortality of 40%. To reduce CRC incidence and mortality, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programme was introduced in 2014. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an established quality marker inversely associated with post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC), but evidence mainly stems from non-FIT populations. Using ADR in a FIT-based setting may be costly due to histopathological examination. Alternative markers like polyp detection rate (PDR) and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SDR) could be viable but lack evidence for their association with PCCRC.METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study of 77 009 FIT-positive participants undergoing colonoscopy (2014-2017). National registry data on CRC outcomes were linked, and endoscopy units were grouped by ADR, PDR and SDR levels. Poisson regression adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities was used to assess PCCRC risk.RESULTS: Among 70 009 colonoscopies within 6 months of FIT positivity, 4401 (92.7%) had CRC, while 342 (7.2%) were PCCRC cases. PCCRC risk was inversely associated with ADR, PDR and SDR. High ADR endoscopy units had a 35% lower PCCRC risk than low ADR units. Similar associations were found for PDR and SDR, with high SDR units showing a 33% lower PCCRC risk than low SDR units.CONCLUSIONS: ADR, PDR and SDR predict PCCRC risk, with SDR emerging as a feasible, cost-efficient quality marker in FIT-based screening. This study supports SDR as a primary performance indicator in future protocols.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in Denmark, with a 5-year mortality of 40%. To reduce CRC incidence and mortality, a faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based screening programme was introduced in 2014. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an established quality marker inversely associated with post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC), but evidence mainly stems from non-FIT populations. Using ADR in a FIT-based setting may be costly due to histopathological examination. Alternative markers like polyp detection rate (PDR) and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SDR) could be viable but lack evidence for their association with PCCRC.METHODS: We conducted a nationwide cohort study of 77 009 FIT-positive participants undergoing colonoscopy (2014-2017). National registry data on CRC outcomes were linked, and endoscopy units were grouped by ADR, PDR and SDR levels. Poisson regression adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities was used to assess PCCRC risk.RESULTS: Among 70 009 colonoscopies within 6 months of FIT positivity, 4401 (92.7%) had CRC, while 342 (7.2%) were PCCRC cases. PCCRC risk was inversely associated with ADR, PDR and SDR. High ADR endoscopy units had a 35% lower PCCRC risk than low ADR units. Similar associations were found for PDR and SDR, with high SDR units showing a 33% lower PCCRC risk than low SDR units.CONCLUSIONS: ADR, PDR and SDR predict PCCRC risk, with SDR emerging as a feasible, cost-efficient quality marker in FIT-based screening. This study supports SDR as a primary performance indicator in future protocols.
KW - Humans
KW - Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Denmark/epidemiology
KW - Male
KW - Female
KW - Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Early Detection of Cancer/methods
KW - Aged
KW - Adenoma/pathology
KW - Occult Blood
KW - Mass Screening/methods
KW - Registries
KW - Colonic Polyps/pathology
KW - Cohort Studies
KW - Incidence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105001183309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001692
DO - 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001692
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40118501
SN - 2054-4774
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open Gastroenterology
JF - BMJ Open Gastroenterology
IS - 1
M1 - e001692
ER -