Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Port placement and patient-specific docking strategies for robotic hysterectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: an international Delphi consensus

Diego Raimondo, Enrico Pazzaglia*, Helder Ferreira, Meera Ragavan, Anne Katrine Friberg, Mads Nielsen-Breining, Giorgia Monterossi, Giovanni Panico, Andrea Rosati, Sara Mastrovito, Kristine Juul Hare, Danny Chou, Eric Francescangeli, Jordi Cassadò Garriga, Stefano Palmieri, Harald Krentel, Laurent de Landsheere, Dimitrios Balafoutas, Mohamed Mabrouk, Renato SeracchioliFrancesco Fanfani

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted hysterectomy is increasingly performed using modular platforms such as the Hugo™ roboticassisted surgery (RAS) system, but optimal or personalised docking strategies remain undefined.

OBJECTIVES: To establish expert consensus on port placement and docking configurations for hysterectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system and to identify patient anthropometric factors requiring modification of standard setups.

METHODS: A modified Delphi consensus was conducted involving two iterative rounds of anonymous, structured questionnaires distributed to an international panel of gynaecological robotic surgeons experienced with the Hugo™ RAS system. Survey items addressed preferred docking configurations, the influence of patient anthropometry on docking strategy, and specific technical adjustments in non-standard scenarios. Consensus was predefined as ≥66.7% agreement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Expert agreement on docking setups, port placement modifications, and anthropometric variables influencing technical adjustments.

RESULTS: Seventeen experts completed round one and 16 completed round two. No single docking configuration reached consensus as universally optimal for standard hysterectomy. Ranking exercises identified the "standard" hysterectomy setup as the most preferred configuration, followed by the "alternate" and the "three-arm" setups. All experts agreed that patient anthropometry requires modification of port placement. Elevated body mass index (BMI), large uterine size and small pelvis were identified as key variables: increasing inter-port distance was recommended for BMI >30, cranial port displacement for large uteri, while no consensus emerged for patients with a small pelvis. A modified bridge configuration was proposed, and achieved strong expert agreement.

CONCLUSIONS: No single docking configuration is deemed to be universally optimal for Hugo™ RAS hysterectomy. Expert practice combines a limited number of preferred setups with patient-tailored adjustments.

WHAT IS NEW?: This study provides the first Delphi-based expert consensus on Hugo™ RAS docking strategies, emphasizing patient-specific adjustments and flexible preoperative planning.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFacts, Views & Vision in ObGyn
Volume18
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)57-66
Number of pages10
ISSN2032-0418
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • Body mass index
  • Delphi consensus
  • robotic hysterectomy
  • robotic-assisted surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Port placement and patient-specific docking strategies for robotic hysterectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: an international Delphi consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this