Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation study

Suzanne C Dixon-Suen, Sarah J Lewis, Richard M Martin, Dallas R English, Terry Boyle, Graham G Giles, Kyriaki Michailidou, Manjeet K Bolla, Qin Wang, Joe Dennis, Michael Lush, Abctb Investigators, Thomas U Ahearn, Christine B Ambrosone, Irene L Andrulis, Hoda Anton-Culver, Volker Arndt, Kristan J Aronson, Annelie Augustinsson, Päivi AuvinenLaura E Beane Freeman, Heiko Becher, Matthias W Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Marina Bermisheva, Carl Blomqvist, Natalia V Bogdanova, Stig E Bojesen, Bernardo Bonanni, Hermann Brenner, Thomas Brüning, Saundra S Buys, Nicola J Camp, Daniele Campa, Federico Canzian, Jose E Castelao, Melissa H Cessna, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J Chanock, Christine L Clarke, Don M Conroy, Fergus J Couch, Angela Cox, Simon S Cross, Kamila Czene, Mary B Daly, Peter Devilee, Thilo Dörk, Miriam Dwek, Henrik Flyger, Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are associated with higher breast cancer risk in observational studies, but ascribing causality is difficult. Mendelian randomisation (MR) assesses causality by simulating randomised trial groups using genotype. We assessed whether lifelong physical activity or sedentary time, assessed using genotype, may be causally associated with breast cancer risk overall, pre/post-menopause, and by case-groups defined by tumour characteristics.

METHODS: We performed two-sample inverse-variance-weighted MR using individual-level Breast Cancer Association Consortium case-control data from 130 957 European-ancestry women (69 838 invasive cases), and published UK Biobank data (n=91 105-377 234). Genetic instruments were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated in UK Biobank with wrist-worn accelerometer-measured overall physical activity (nsnps=5) or sedentary time (nsnps=6), or accelerometer-measured (nsnps=1) or self-reported (nsnps=5) vigorous physical activity.

RESULTS: Greater genetically-predicted overall activity was associated with lower breast cancer overall risk (OR=0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.83 per-standard deviation (SD;~8 milligravities acceleration)) and for most case-groups. Genetically-predicted vigorous activity was associated with lower risk of pre/perimenopausal breast cancer (OR=0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87,≥3 vs. 0 self-reported days/week), with consistent estimates for most case-groups. Greater genetically-predicted sedentary time was associated with higher hormone-receptor-negative tumour risk (OR=1.77; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.92 per-SD (~7% time spent sedentary)), with elevated estimates for most case-groups. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses examining pleiotropy (including weighted-median-MR, MR-Egger).

CONCLUSION: Our study provides strong evidence that greater overall physical activity, greater vigorous activity, and lower sedentary time are likely to reduce breast cancer risk. More widespread adoption of active lifestyles may reduce the burden from the most common cancer in women.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume56
Issue number20
Pages (from-to)1157-1170
Number of pages14
ISSN0306-3674
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
  • Exercise
  • Mendelian Randomization Analysis
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Risk Factors
  • Sedentary Behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this