Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Person-centred care in congenital heart disease: Intercountry variation in patient-reported experiences across 32 countries

Birgitte Lykkeberg*, Anne Vinggaard Christensen, Selina Kikkenborg Berg, Signe Holm Larsen, Liesbet Van Bulck, Eva Goossens, Adrienne H Kovacs, Koen Luyckx, Laila Akbar Ladak, Mohamed Leye, Alexander Van De Bruaene, Ming Chern Leong, Anna Kaneva, Ernando Amaral, John Jairo Araujo, Navaneetha Sasikumar, Harald Gabriel, Dejuma Yadeta Goshu, Jou-Kou Wang, Junko EnomotoMaria Emília Areias, Diamantis Kosmidis, Louise Coats, Anne Marie Valente, Ju Ryoung Moon, Magalie Ladouceur, Corina Thomet, Jamie L Jackson, Camilla Sandberg, Edward Callus, Yuli Y Kim, Luis Alday, Charlene Bredy, Arwa Saidi, Fernando Baraona Reyes, Samuel Menahem, Michèle de Hosson, Joanna Hlebowicz, Christina Christersson, Ali Zaidi, Bengt Johansson, Brith Andresen, Jean-Claude Ambassa, Zacharias Mandalenakis, Andrew Constantine, Pascal Amedro, Joost P Van Melle, Ari Cedars, Lucia Ortiz, Philip Moons, APPROACH-IS II consortium, on behalf of the International Society for Adults Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD)

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Person-centred care (PCC) is widely recommended by the World Health Organisation and other leading healthcare organisations. Although individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) require lifelong follow-up, it remains unclear whether healthcare systems worldwide provide PCC to this population. This study investigated one key component of PCC, autonomy support, using patient-reported experiences in a global sample of adults with CHD.

METHODS: The study was part of the international cross-sectional APPROACH-IS-II. Data were obtained from 8367 adults with congenital heart disease across 53 centres in 32 countries. Perceived autonomy support was measured using a modified version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire. A general linear mixed model was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS: Autonomy support scores ranged from 27.9 (SD ± 9.4) to 37.7 (SD ± 6.3) on a six - 42 point scale. A significant clinical difference in perceived autonomy was observed, with calculated effect sizes using Cohen's D exceeding eight in several countries. Higher autonomy scores were associated with having a high school diploma and older age. Patient characteristics accounted for 1.4 % of the variance, while geographical location explained 7.5 %. A large proportion of the variance remained unexplained.

CONCLUSION: This study highlights significant global differences in perceived autonomy support from healthcare providers among adults with CHD. Education and age were associated with higher levels of perceived autonomy support. The experience of PCC is challenged by diverse expectations of individuals and families, healthcare providers' beliefs and values, institutional policies, and broader sociocultural contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Article number133958
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume444
ISSN0167-5273
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2026

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy
  • Humans
  • Internationality
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Patient-Centered Care/standards
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult
  • PREMs
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Person-Centred care
  • Patient-Centred care
  • ACHD care
  • Autonomy support

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Person-centred care in congenital heart disease: Intercountry variation in patient-reported experiences across 32 countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this