TY - JOUR
T1 - Person-centred care in congenital heart disease
T2 - Intercountry variation in patient-reported experiences across 32 countries
AU - Lykkeberg, Birgitte
AU - Christensen, Anne Vinggaard
AU - Berg, Selina Kikkenborg
AU - Larsen, Signe Holm
AU - Van Bulck, Liesbet
AU - Goossens, Eva
AU - Kovacs, Adrienne H
AU - Luyckx, Koen
AU - Ladak, Laila Akbar
AU - Leye, Mohamed
AU - Van De Bruaene, Alexander
AU - Leong, Ming Chern
AU - Kaneva, Anna
AU - Amaral, Ernando
AU - Araujo, John Jairo
AU - Sasikumar, Navaneetha
AU - Gabriel, Harald
AU - Goshu, Dejuma Yadeta
AU - Wang, Jou-Kou
AU - Enomoto, Junko
AU - Areias, Maria Emília
AU - Kosmidis, Diamantis
AU - Coats, Louise
AU - Valente, Anne Marie
AU - Moon, Ju Ryoung
AU - Ladouceur, Magalie
AU - Thomet, Corina
AU - Jackson, Jamie L
AU - Sandberg, Camilla
AU - Callus, Edward
AU - Kim, Yuli Y
AU - Alday, Luis
AU - Bredy, Charlene
AU - Saidi, Arwa
AU - Reyes, Fernando Baraona
AU - Menahem, Samuel
AU - de Hosson, Michèle
AU - Hlebowicz, Joanna
AU - Christersson, Christina
AU - Zaidi, Ali
AU - Johansson, Bengt
AU - Andresen, Brith
AU - Ambassa, Jean-Claude
AU - Mandalenakis, Zacharias
AU - Constantine, Andrew
AU - Amedro, Pascal
AU - Van Melle, Joost P
AU - Cedars, Ari
AU - Ortiz, Lucia
AU - Moons, Philip
AU - APPROACH-IS II consortium, on behalf of the International Society for Adults Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD)
N1 - Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2026/2/1
Y1 - 2026/2/1
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Person-centred care (PCC) is widely recommended by the World Health Organisation and other leading healthcare organisations. Although individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) require lifelong follow-up, it remains unclear whether healthcare systems worldwide provide PCC to this population. This study investigated one key component of PCC, autonomy support, using patient-reported experiences in a global sample of adults with CHD.METHODS: The study was part of the international cross-sectional APPROACH-IS-II. Data were obtained from 8367 adults with congenital heart disease across 53 centres in 32 countries. Perceived autonomy support was measured using a modified version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire. A general linear mixed model was used to analyse the data.RESULTS: Autonomy support scores ranged from 27.9 (SD ± 9.4) to 37.7 (SD ± 6.3) on a six - 42 point scale. A significant clinical difference in perceived autonomy was observed, with calculated effect sizes using Cohen's D exceeding eight in several countries. Higher autonomy scores were associated with having a high school diploma and older age. Patient characteristics accounted for 1.4 % of the variance, while geographical location explained 7.5 %. A large proportion of the variance remained unexplained.CONCLUSION: This study highlights significant global differences in perceived autonomy support from healthcare providers among adults with CHD. Education and age were associated with higher levels of perceived autonomy support. The experience of PCC is challenged by diverse expectations of individuals and families, healthcare providers' beliefs and values, institutional policies, and broader sociocultural contexts.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Person-centred care (PCC) is widely recommended by the World Health Organisation and other leading healthcare organisations. Although individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) require lifelong follow-up, it remains unclear whether healthcare systems worldwide provide PCC to this population. This study investigated one key component of PCC, autonomy support, using patient-reported experiences in a global sample of adults with CHD.METHODS: The study was part of the international cross-sectional APPROACH-IS-II. Data were obtained from 8367 adults with congenital heart disease across 53 centres in 32 countries. Perceived autonomy support was measured using a modified version of the Health Care Climate Questionnaire. A general linear mixed model was used to analyse the data.RESULTS: Autonomy support scores ranged from 27.9 (SD ± 9.4) to 37.7 (SD ± 6.3) on a six - 42 point scale. A significant clinical difference in perceived autonomy was observed, with calculated effect sizes using Cohen's D exceeding eight in several countries. Higher autonomy scores were associated with having a high school diploma and older age. Patient characteristics accounted for 1.4 % of the variance, while geographical location explained 7.5 %. A large proportion of the variance remained unexplained.CONCLUSION: This study highlights significant global differences in perceived autonomy support from healthcare providers among adults with CHD. Education and age were associated with higher levels of perceived autonomy support. The experience of PCC is challenged by diverse expectations of individuals and families, healthcare providers' beliefs and values, institutional policies, and broader sociocultural contexts.
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Cross-Sectional Studies
KW - Female
KW - Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy
KW - Humans
KW - Internationality
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Patient Reported Outcome Measures
KW - Patient-Centered Care/standards
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Young Adult
KW - PREMs
KW - Congenital heart disease
KW - Person-Centred care
KW - Patient-Centred care
KW - ACHD care
KW - Autonomy support
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020767701
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133958
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133958
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 41067646
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 444
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
M1 - 133958
ER -