Abstract
Standardised and universal perioperative endpoint reporting are the cornerstone for outcomes assessment, reliable clinical trials, and health services research. The Outcome4medicine initiative recently reported consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions, proposing a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions. In the same field, the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine - Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) group recently proposed standardised and valid measures of mortality and morbidity, derived from a three-stage Delphi process. Here a core group of the Outcome4medicine conference discusses how these two initiatives are aligned and emphasises the importance of standardised outcome assessment by integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | British Journal of Anaesthesia |
| Volume | 131 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | 969-971 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| ISSN | 0007-0912 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- consensus recommendations
- morbidity
- mortality
- perioperative medicine
- surgical outcome assessment
- Perioperative Care
- Delphi Technique
- Quality Improvement
- Humans
- Treatment Outcome
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Research Design
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Perioperative outcome assessment from the perspectives of different stakeholders: need for reconsideration?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS