Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Perioperative Colonic Evaluation in Patients with Rectal Cancer; MR Colonography Versus Standard Care

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. 1H MRS Assessment of Hepatic Fat Content: Comparison Between Normal- and Excess-weight Children and Adolescents

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Preoperative evaluation of synchronous colorectal cancer using MR colonography

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. MR colonography with fecal tagging: barium vs. barium ferumoxsil

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Fluorescence guided intraluminal endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract: A systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Gastrointestinal Applications of Iodine Quantification Using Dual-Energy CT: A Systematic Review

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. More than one-third of Cochrane reviews had gift authors, whereas ghost authorship was rare

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Group authorships in Cochrane had low compliance with Cochrane recommendations

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Preoperative colonic evaluation is often inadequate because of cancer stenosis making a full conventional colonoscopy (CC) impossible. In several studies, cancer stenosis has been shown in up to 16%-34% of patients with colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the completion rate of preoperative colonic evaluation and the quality of perioperative colonic evaluation using magnetic resonance colonography (MRC) in patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer were randomized to either group A: standard preoperative diagnostic work-up or group B: preoperative MR diagnostic work-up (standard preoperative diagnostic work-up + MRC). A complete and adequate perioperative clean-colon evaluation (PCE) was defined as either a complete preoperative colonic evaluation or a complete colonic evaluation within 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were randomized to group A and 28 to group B. Complete preoperative colonic evaluation with CC was achieved in 39% patients in group A and 93% for group B (Fisher's exact test, P < .001). PCE with CC was achieved in 64% and 93% in groups A and B, respectively (Fisher's exact test, P = .02). In group A, one synchronous cancer was found by CC. However, the location was misjudged as a sigmoid cancer. In group B, two synchronous cancers were found in the same patient who had an insufficient preoperative CC due to an obstructing rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS: MRC is a valuable tool and is recommended as part of the standard preoperative evaluation for patients with rectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAcademic Radiology
Volume22
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)1522-8
Number of pages7
ISSN1076-6332
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

ID: 45793845