Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Peer-Mentor Support for Older, Vulnerable Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Mixed Methods Process-Outcome Evaluation

Maria Pedersen*, Rikke Agnete Petersen, Takyiwa Boateng, Ingrid Egerod, Dorthe Overgaard, Birgitte Bøcher Bennich

*Corresponding author for this work

Abstract

AIM: To achieve a deeper understanding of the results of a primary randomised controlled trial to clarify the potential effective mechanisms and barriers of a peer-mentor intervention.

DESIGN: Mixed methods process-outcome evaluation of the intervention.

METHOD: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected during the intervention in a during-trial set-up, that is, a convergent design.

RESULTS: The qualitative and quantitative findings mostly confirmed and expanded each other, identifying several mechanisms that facilitate the effectiveness of peer-mentor support during cardiac rehabilitation, such as mentors' experience-based knowledge and motivation. However, barriers related to lifestyle changes among older, vulnerable patients (e.g., mentee concerns about heart-healthy diets) and psychological outcomes (e.g., mentees' resilience) may minimise the effectiveness.

CONCLUSION: Peer-mentoring holds potential for supporting older, vulnerable patients during cardiac rehabilitation. However, ensuring that peer-mentors are well-suited for their role and capable of providing motivational, experience-based support is crucial, as is the need for tailored mentorship and consideration of specific patient populations needing mentor-supported cardiac rehabilitation.

IMPLICATIONS AND IMPACT: Cardiac rehabilitation faces challenges due to high drop-out rates, particularly among older individuals, females, and vulnerable patients. Peer mentoring, a low-cost intervention, holds promise for supporting these groups in cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

REPORTING METHOD: The study adheres to the 'Systematic Development of Standards for Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation Health Sciences Research', 'Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study' and 'Template for Intervention Description and Replication'.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A group of patients with cardiovascular disease actively contributed to developing and implementing the intervention.

TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04945486-prospectively registered before the first participant was recruited.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume81
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)8946-8958
Number of pages13
ISSN0309-2402
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiac Rehabilitation/psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mentoring/methods
  • Mentors/psychology
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Ischemia/rehabilitation
  • Peer Group
  • Social Support
  • Vulnerable Populations/psychology
  • nursing
  • rehabilitation
  • mentors
  • coronary heart disease
  • older people
  • mixed methods design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peer-Mentor Support for Older, Vulnerable Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Mixed Methods Process-Outcome Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this