Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Mental Health Clinical Research: A Descriptive Review in Comparison with Clinician-Rated Outcome Measures

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair are insufficiently validated: a systematic review

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Invalid methods lead to inappropriate conclusions

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Nationwide quality improvement of cholecystectomy: results from a national database

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. How are medication errors defined? A systematic literature review of definitions and characteristics

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Hippocampal Volume and Memory Impairment after Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients with Depression

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Imagery rehearsal therapy and/or mianserin in treatment of refugees diagnosed with PTSD: Results from a randomized controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Pragmatic antipsychotics trial-caution in interpretation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Volume of hippocampal subregions and clinical improvement following electroconvulsive therapy in patients with depression

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: To review how patient-reported outcomes measures in mental health clinical research complement traditional clinician-rated outcomes measures.

DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and Scopus.

STUDY SELECTION: Latest update of the literature search was conducted in August 2019, using a specified set of search terms to identify controlled and uncontrolled studies (published since 1996) of pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions in adults (≥18 years) in hospital-based mental health care.

DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors extracted data independently using a pre-designed extraction form.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 2962 publications identified, 257 were assessed by full text reading. A total of 24 studies reported in 26 publications were included in this descriptive review. We identified subjective and objective outcome measures, classified these according to the pharmacopsychometric triangle and compared them qualitatively in terms of incremental information added to the clinical study question. The data reviewed here from primarily depression and schizophrenia intervention studies show that results from patient-reported outcome measures and clinician-rated outcome measures generally point in the same direction. There was a relative lack of patient-reported outcome measures on functioning and medication side effects compared with patient-reported outcome measures on symptom burden and health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcomes and clinician-rate outcomes supplement each other and at most times support identical study conclusions. Future studies would benefit from a more systematic approach towards use of patient-reported outcomes and a clearer rationale of how to weigh and report the results in comparison with clinician-rated outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
ISSN1353-4505
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jan 2021

ID: 61715339