Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Patient-controlled analgesia with remifentanil vs. alternative parenteral methods for pain management in labour: a Cochrane systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. From variance to guidance for awake tracheal intubation

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Red blood cell transfusion in surgery: an observational study of the trends in the USA from 2011 to 2016

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Challenges in optimising recovery after emergency laparotomy

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  4. Variation in the practice of tracheal intubation in Europe after traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Enhanced postoperative recovery: good from afar, but far from good?

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Reply to: will one hour less make any difference?

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Clonidine in pediatric anesthesia: the new panacea or a drug still looking for an indication?

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  3. Clear fluids fasting for elective paediatric anaesthesia: The European Society of Anaesthesiology consensus statement

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR): a multicentre, prospective observational study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  5. Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Y Jelting
  • S Weibel
  • A Afshari
  • N L Pace
  • J Jokinen
  • T Artmann
  • L H J Eberhart
  • P Kranke
View graph of relations

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of remifentanil used as intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the pain of labour. We performed a systematic literature search in December 2015 (updated in December 2016). We included randomised, controlled and cluster-randomised trials of women in labour with planned vaginal delivery receiving patient-controlled remifentanil compared principally with other parenteral and patient-controlled opioids, epidural analgesia and continuous remifentanil infusion or placebo. The primary outcomes were patient satisfaction with pain relief and the occurrence of adverse events for mothers and newborns. We assessed risk of bias for each included study and applied the GRADE approach for the quality of evidence. We included total zero event trials, using a constant continuity correction of 0.01 and a random-effect meta-analysis. Twenty studies were included in the qualitative analysis; within these, 3713 participants were randomised and 3569 analysed. Most of our pre-specified outcomes were not studied in the included trials. However, we found evidence that women using patient-controlled remifentanil were more satisfied with pain relief than women receiving parenteral opioids (four trials, 216 patients, very low quality evidence) with a standardised mean difference ([SMD] 95%CI) of 2.11 (0.72-3.49), but were less satisfied than women receiving epidural analgesia (seven trials, 2135 patients, very low quality evidence), -0.22 (-0.40 to -0.04). Data on adverse events were sparse. However, the relative risk (95%CI) for maternal respiratory depression for patient-controlled remifentanil compared with epidural analgesia (three trials, 687 patients, low-quality evidence) was 0.91 (0.51-1.62). Compared with continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil (two trials, 135 patients, low-quality evidence) no conclusion could be reached as all study arms showed zero events. The relative risk (95%CI) of Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 min after birth compared with epidural analgesia (five trials, 1322 participants, low-quality evidence) was 1.26 (0.62-2.57).

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume72
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1016-1028
Number of pages13
ISSN0003-2409
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

    Research areas

  • Journal Article, Review

ID: 52406986