Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Ovarian removal at or after benign hysterectomy and breast cancer: a nationwide cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Breast cancer mortality and overdiagnosis after implementation of population-based screening in Denmark

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Induction of PIK3CA alterations during neoadjuvant letrozole may improve outcome in postmenopausal breast cancer patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Patterns in detection of recurrence among patients treated for breast cancer

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Endometrial cancer risk after fertility treatment: a population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. HPV types, cervical high-grade lesions and risk factors for oncogenic human papillomavirus infection among 3416 Tanzanian women

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Ovarian and Breast Cancer Risks Associated With Pathogenic Variants in RAD51C and RAD51D

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Gynaecological cancer leads to long-term sick leave and permanently reduced working ability years after diagnosis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: Large-scale population-based registry studies investigating the risk of breast cancer after removal of both ovaries at hysterectomy for benign conditions in women with no known genetic predisposition to cancer are needed. We aimed to perform such a study taking into account the age at surgery status and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

METHODS: Within the female population of Denmark born 1937-1996, we evaluated breast cancer incidence after unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy concomitant with or after benign hysterectomy in comparison with no surgery and with hysterectomy alone using health registry data during 1978-2016. In a subpopulation followed from 1996, the analyses were stratified according to use of HRT.

RESULTS: We found a reduced risk of breast cancer among women aged < 45 years at bilateral oophorectomy compared with women with hysterectomy alone (HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.66, 0.92), whereas slightly increased risks were seen in women above 50 years. In the subpopulation, non-users of HRT aged ≥ 50 years at oophorectomy had a HR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.56, 0.98) for breast cancer after bilateral oophorectomy compared with hysterectomy alone.

CONCLUSIONS: Our large-scale study covering four decades provides evidence that bilateral oophorectomy performed at young age in women with benign indications for hysterectomy is associated with a reduction in breast cancer risk. The finding of a negative association at older ages in women not using HRT deserves further attention.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBreast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume181
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)475-485
Number of pages11
ISSN0167-6806
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

ID: 59886129