Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Outcome of osteoporosis evaluation, treatment, and follow-up in patients referred to a specialized outpatient clinic compared to patients in care of general practitioners

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{8d6d02b9b6554e59ae4c8c97ea88fecc,
title = "Outcome of osteoporosis evaluation, treatment, and follow-up in patients referred to a specialized outpatient clinic compared to patients in care of general practitioners",
abstract = "Summary: In Denmark, osteoporosis treatment is either handled by general practitioners or at more resource demanding specialist clinics. We evaluated the treatment adherence and persistence in the two settings, which were overall similar. The type of medical support did, however, differ and was provided to two very different patient populations. Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the effect of patient care by general practitioners (GPs) or specialists on treatment adherence among osteoporosis patients initiating treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB). Methods: Dual-energy X-ray absorption (DXA)-scanning data from 2005 to 2013 were extracted. Treatment na{\"i}ve patients with a T-score ≤ − 2.5 (spine or hip) were included. Information on medical treatment, comorbidities, and socio-economic status was extracted from Danish registries. Scanning results were evaluated by a specialist. Subsequent treatment initiation and follow-up was either handled by GPs or specialists: GP population (GPP) vs. specialist population (SP). Primary adherence was defined as treatment initiating within 12 months from diagnosis and secondary adherence as days with medicine possession rates (MPR) > 80%. Results: Of 11,201 DXA-scanned patients, 3685 met the inclusion criteria (GPP = 2177, SP = 1508). The GPP consisted of relatively more men, was older, had shorter education, lower income, and more comorbidities. There was no difference in baseline T-score or prior incidence of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs). The GPP was primarily treated with OB and had better primary adherence (adjusted OR GPP/SP = 1.52 [1.31–1.75], p < 0.0001) than the SP that to a higher degree received another treatment. Secondary adherence was similar (adjusted OR GPP/SP: OR 12 months = 1.02 [0.83–1.26]; OR 24 months = 0.90 [0.73–1.10]; OR 4 years = 0.88 [0.71–1.07]; OR 5 years = 0.91 [0.74–1.13]. Conclusion: Patients in care of specialists were most likely to receive a treatment other than OB. Primary adherence was highest in the GPP, whereas short- and long-term persistence was similar for up to 5 years whether treated by a specialist or a GP. ",
keywords = "Ambulatory Care Facilities, Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use, Female, Follow-Up Studies, General Practitioners, Humans, Male, Medication Adherence, Osteoporosis/diagnosis, Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology",
author = "Hitz, {Mette Friberg} and Sofie Arup and Holm, {Jakob Praest} and Soerensen, {Anne Lyngholm} and Gerds, {Thomas Alexander} and Jensen, {Jens-Erik Beck}",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11657-020-00774-9",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Archives of Osteoporosis",
issn = "1862-3522",
publisher = "Springer U K",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome of osteoporosis evaluation, treatment, and follow-up in patients referred to a specialized outpatient clinic compared to patients in care of general practitioners

AU - Hitz, Mette Friberg

AU - Arup, Sofie

AU - Holm, Jakob Praest

AU - Soerensen, Anne Lyngholm

AU - Gerds, Thomas Alexander

AU - Jensen, Jens-Erik Beck

PY - 2020/12/1

Y1 - 2020/12/1

N2 - Summary: In Denmark, osteoporosis treatment is either handled by general practitioners or at more resource demanding specialist clinics. We evaluated the treatment adherence and persistence in the two settings, which were overall similar. The type of medical support did, however, differ and was provided to two very different patient populations. Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the effect of patient care by general practitioners (GPs) or specialists on treatment adherence among osteoporosis patients initiating treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB). Methods: Dual-energy X-ray absorption (DXA)-scanning data from 2005 to 2013 were extracted. Treatment naïve patients with a T-score ≤ − 2.5 (spine or hip) were included. Information on medical treatment, comorbidities, and socio-economic status was extracted from Danish registries. Scanning results were evaluated by a specialist. Subsequent treatment initiation and follow-up was either handled by GPs or specialists: GP population (GPP) vs. specialist population (SP). Primary adherence was defined as treatment initiating within 12 months from diagnosis and secondary adherence as days with medicine possession rates (MPR) > 80%. Results: Of 11,201 DXA-scanned patients, 3685 met the inclusion criteria (GPP = 2177, SP = 1508). The GPP consisted of relatively more men, was older, had shorter education, lower income, and more comorbidities. There was no difference in baseline T-score or prior incidence of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs). The GPP was primarily treated with OB and had better primary adherence (adjusted OR GPP/SP = 1.52 [1.31–1.75], p < 0.0001) than the SP that to a higher degree received another treatment. Secondary adherence was similar (adjusted OR GPP/SP: OR 12 months = 1.02 [0.83–1.26]; OR 24 months = 0.90 [0.73–1.10]; OR 4 years = 0.88 [0.71–1.07]; OR 5 years = 0.91 [0.74–1.13]. Conclusion: Patients in care of specialists were most likely to receive a treatment other than OB. Primary adherence was highest in the GPP, whereas short- and long-term persistence was similar for up to 5 years whether treated by a specialist or a GP.

AB - Summary: In Denmark, osteoporosis treatment is either handled by general practitioners or at more resource demanding specialist clinics. We evaluated the treatment adherence and persistence in the two settings, which were overall similar. The type of medical support did, however, differ and was provided to two very different patient populations. Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the effect of patient care by general practitioners (GPs) or specialists on treatment adherence among osteoporosis patients initiating treatment with oral bisphosphonates (OB). Methods: Dual-energy X-ray absorption (DXA)-scanning data from 2005 to 2013 were extracted. Treatment naïve patients with a T-score ≤ − 2.5 (spine or hip) were included. Information on medical treatment, comorbidities, and socio-economic status was extracted from Danish registries. Scanning results were evaluated by a specialist. Subsequent treatment initiation and follow-up was either handled by GPs or specialists: GP population (GPP) vs. specialist population (SP). Primary adherence was defined as treatment initiating within 12 months from diagnosis and secondary adherence as days with medicine possession rates (MPR) > 80%. Results: Of 11,201 DXA-scanned patients, 3685 met the inclusion criteria (GPP = 2177, SP = 1508). The GPP consisted of relatively more men, was older, had shorter education, lower income, and more comorbidities. There was no difference in baseline T-score or prior incidence of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs). The GPP was primarily treated with OB and had better primary adherence (adjusted OR GPP/SP = 1.52 [1.31–1.75], p < 0.0001) than the SP that to a higher degree received another treatment. Secondary adherence was similar (adjusted OR GPP/SP: OR 12 months = 1.02 [0.83–1.26]; OR 24 months = 0.90 [0.73–1.10]; OR 4 years = 0.88 [0.71–1.07]; OR 5 years = 0.91 [0.74–1.13]. Conclusion: Patients in care of specialists were most likely to receive a treatment other than OB. Primary adherence was highest in the GPP, whereas short- and long-term persistence was similar for up to 5 years whether treated by a specialist or a GP.

KW - Ambulatory Care Facilities

KW - Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - General Practitioners

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Medication Adherence

KW - Osteoporosis/diagnosis

KW - Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087090518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11657-020-00774-9

DO - 10.1007/s11657-020-00774-9

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32588150

VL - 15

JO - Archives of Osteoporosis

JF - Archives of Osteoporosis

SN - 1862-3522

IS - 1

M1 - 97

ER -

ID: 60187881