Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

One-Stop Dispensing: Hospital Costs and Patient Perspectives on Self-Management of Medication

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Fibrogenesis and inflammation contribute to the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Elevated suPAR Is an Independent Risk Marker for Incident Kidney Disease in Acute Medical Patients

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Post-hospital medical respite care for homeless people in Denmark: a randomized controlled trial and cost-utility analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Soluble Urokinase Receptor and Acute Kidney Injury

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterResearchpeer-review

  5. Characteristics of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia at Hvidovre Hospital, March-April 2020

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

(1) Objective: To assess hospital medication costs and staff time between One-Stop Dispensing (OSD) and the Traditional Medication System (TMS), and to evaluate patient perspectives on OSD. (2) Methods: The study was conducted at Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark in an elective gastric surgery and acute orthopedic surgery department. This study consists of three sub-studies including adult patients able to self-manage medication. In Sub-study 1, staff time used to dispense and administer medication in TMS was assessed. Medication cost and OSD staff time were collected in Sub-study 2, while patient perspectives were assessed in Sub-study 3. Medication costs with two days of discharge medication were compared between measured OSD cost and simulated TMS cost for the same patients. Measured staff time in OSD was compared to simulated staff time in TMS for the same patients. Patient satisfaction related to OSD was evaluated by a questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale ('very poor' (1) to 'very good' (5)). (3) Results: In total, 78 elective and 70 acute OSD patients were included. Overall, there was no significant difference between OSD and TMS in medication cost per patient ($2.03 [95% CI -0.57⁻4.63]) (p = 0.131). Compared with TMS, OSD significantly reduced staff time by an average of 12 min (p ≤ 0.001) per patient per hospitalization. The patients' satisfaction for OSD was high with an average score of 4.5 ± 0.7. (4) Conclusion: There were no differences in medication costs, but staff time was significantly lower in OSD and patients were overall satisfied with OSD.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)
Volume6
Issue number2
ISSN2226-4787
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

ID: 54573071