Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the development of common procedures used as treatment for rectal prolapse over a decade and to determine if the choice of primary operation affects the reoperation rate.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of operative data from a National Data Registry, Landspatientregisteret (LPR), from the period of January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2014. All hospitalized surgical treatments are registered in LPR.
RESULTS: Sixteen hundred and twenty-five patients with rectal prolapse underwent 1834 operations. There were 94% women and mean age at surgery was 71.6 ± 18.1 years, with no difference over the 11 years. The types of operations performed differed (p < 0.0001), with an increase in overall number of operations and increasing use of laparoscopic procedures. There were 209 reoperations, of which 129 patients were primarily operated with a perineal procedure. The mean age at reoperation was 72.8 ± 17.3 years. The most frequently used reoperation was laparoscopic rectopexy. The overall reoperation rate was 16%: 10% for both open and laparoscopic rectopexy, and for perineal procedures 26% (p < 0.001). The overall 30-day mortality was 2.1% and there was no difference in mortality between the procedures (p = 0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall number of rectal prolapse operations was increasing. There was a clear trend towards extended use of laparoscopic rectopexy both as primary procedure and as reoperation. The highest reoperation rates were for the perineal procedures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Journal of Colorectal Disease |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 299-304 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| ISSN | 0179-1958 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2018 |
Keywords
- Aged
- Denmark/epidemiology
- Female
- Humans
- Length of Stay
- Male
- Rectal Prolapse/mortality
- Reoperation
- Survival Analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'One decade of rectal prolapse surgery: a national study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS