Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Oncological outcome following laparoscopic versus open surgery for cancer in the transverse colon: a nationwide cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Optimizing quantitative fluorescence angiography for visceral perfusion assessment

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Visceral obesity and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Visceral obesity and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Large Incisional Hernias Increase in Size

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Interval Walking Improves Glycemic Control and Body Composition After Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Surgical management of acute cholecystitis in a nationwide Danish cohort

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: The literature on transverse colonic cancer resection is sparse. The optimal surgical approach for this disease is thus unknown. This study aimed to examine laparoscopic versus open surgery for transverse colonic cancer.

METHODS: This study was a nationwide, retrospective cohort study of all patients registered with a transverse colonic cancer in Denmark between 2010 and 2013. Data were obtained from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, the Danish Pathology Registry, Danish National Patient Registry, and patients' records. Main outcome measures were surgical resection plane, lymph node yield, and long-term cancer recurrence and survival.

RESULTS: In total, 357 patients were included. Non-mesocolic resection was more frequent with laparoscopic compared with open resection (adjusted odds ratio 2.44, 95% CI 1.29-4.60, P = 0.006). Median number of harvested lymph nodes was higher after open compared with laparoscopic resection (22 versus 19, P = 0.03). Non-mesocolic resection (adjusted hazard ratio 2.45, 95% CI 1.25-4.79, P = 0.01) and increasing tumor stage (P < 0.001) were factors associated with recurrence. Cancer recurrence was significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 4.32, 95% CI 2.75-6.79, P < 0.001). Overall mortality was, however, not associated with the surgical approach or surgical plane.

CONCLUSIONS: Although associated with a lower rate of mesocolic resection plane and fewer lymph nodes harvested, laparoscopic surgery for transverse colonic cancers led to similar long-term results compared with open resection.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume32
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)4148-4157
Number of pages10
ISSN0930-2794
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

ID: 55452489