Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Nurses' Indications for Administration of Perioperative Intravenous Fluid Therapy-A Prospective, Descriptive, Single-Center Cohort Study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Patients' perception of noise in the operating room--a descriptive and analytic cross-sectional study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Should patients walk from the postanesthesia care unit to the general ward after a lumbar discectomy? A randomized study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Implementing mandatory early warning scoring impacts nurses' practice of documenting free text notes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. “It is two worlds” cross-sectoral nurse collaboration related to care transitions: A qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Prioritizing Family Health of Older People in Europe: Current State and Future Directions of Family Nursing and Family-Focused Care

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

PURPOSE: To examine whether nurse anesthetists and postanesthesia nurses' administration of intravenous (IV) fluid therapy during surgery and in the postanesthesia care unit is based on evidence. Secondarily to investigate if providing indications for IV fluid administration changed nursing practice.

DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive, single-center study in Scandinavia comparing two cohorts.

METHODS: Descriptive, fluid volume, and type data were obtained in both cohorts. Cohort 1 (n = 126) was used as baseline data. In cohort 2 (n = 130), nurses recorded indications for type and volume of fluid therapy using a validated list. Analysis compared median volumes of crystalloid or colloid fluids of surgical types by cohort. Analysis compared frequency of given indication reasons for each IV fluid by surgical type.

FINDINGS: Basic static variables were chosen most frequently for indications of IV fluid needed for all surgeries except high-risk abdominal surgery where dynamic variables were more frequent. Signs and symptoms of inadequate tissue perfusion were only sparsely indicated. The volume of intraoperative crystalloid fluids was statistically different for patients with hip fracture surgery in cohort 2. Volumes of both colloid and crystalloid fluids were significantly higher for high-risk abdominal surgery in cohort 2.

CONCLUSIONS: Nurse anesthetists and nurses in the postanesthesia care unit rely more on basic static parameters than signs of inadequate tissue perfusion when they make decisions about fluid administration. The indications cited for fluid administered to high-risk abdominal surgery and hip fracture patients did not always fit guidelines. This indicates the need of a stronger intervention to change practice to follow evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Perianesthesia Nursing
Volume34
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)717-728
Number of pages12
ISSN1089-9472
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

    Research areas

  • clinical guidelines, evidence-based nursing, intravenous fluid administration, nurse anesthetists, perianesthesia, perioperative nursing

ID: 57355970