Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Novel methods to study aphasia recovery after stroke

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. What's in a Name? Neurological Eponyms of the Nazi Era

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. A brain-computer interface to support functional recovery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Diagnostic approach to functional recovery: functional magnetic resonance imaging after stroke

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Diagnostic approach to functional recovery: diffusion-weighted imaging and tractography

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Can topical application of numbing cream improve the efficacy of sham TDCS?

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterResearch

  2. Sensitivity and resolution improvement for in vivo magnetic resonance current-density imaging of the human brain

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Recording brain responses to TMS of primary motor cortex by EEG - utility of an optimized sham procedure

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations
The neural mechanisms that support aphasia recovery are not yet fully understood. It has been argued that the functional reorganization of language networks after left-hemisphere stroke may engage perilesional left brain areas as well as homologous right-hemisphere regions. In this chapter, we summarize how noninvasive brain stimulation can be used to elucidate mechanisms of plasticity in language networks and enhance language recovery after stroke. We first outline some basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We then present evidence from studies in healthy volunteers for a causal role of the right hemisphere in different language functions. Finally, we review recent studies that used TMS or tDCS to promote language recovery after stroke. Most of these studies applied noninvasive brain stimulation over contralateral right-hemisphere areas to suppress maladaptive plasticity. However, some studies also suggest that right-hemisphere regions may beneficially contribute to recovery in some patients. More recently, some investigators have targeted perilesional brain regions to promote neurorehabilitation. In sum, these studies indicate that language recovery after stroke may integrate left- as well as right-hemisphere brain regions to a different degree over the time course of recovery. Although the results of these preliminary studies provide some evidence that noninvasive brain stimulation may promote aphasia recovery, the reported effect sizes are not striking. Future studies on larger patient collectives are needed to explore whether noninvasive brain stimulation can enhance language functions at a level that is clinically relevant.
Original languageEnglish
Book seriesFrontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience
Volume32
Pages (from-to)101-111
Number of pages11
ISSN1660-4431
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

ID: 42442484