Non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and left ventricular ejection fraction. Radionuclide cardiography compared with left ventricular cardioangiography

H Kelbaek, J H Svendsen, J Aldershvile, K Folke, S L Nielsen

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The stroke volume (SV) was determined by first passage radionuclide cardiography and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by multigated radionuclide cardiography in 20 patients with ischemic heart disease. The results were evaluated against those obtained by the invasive dye dilution or thermodilution and left ventricular cardioangiographic techniques. In a paired comparison the mean difference between the invasive and radionuclide SV was -1 ml (SED 3.1) with a correlation coefficient of 0.83 (p less than 0.01). Radionuclide LVEF values also correlated well with cardioangiographic measurements, r = 0.93 (p less than 0.001). LVEF determined by multigated radionuclide cardiography was, however, significantly lower than when measured by cardioangiography, the mean difference being 6 per cent (p less than 0.001). These findings suggest that radionuclide determinations of SV and LVEF are reliable. The discrepancy between the non-invasive and invasive LVEF values raises the question, whether LVEF is overestimated by cardioangiography or underestimated by radionuclide cardiography.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Radiologica
Volume29
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)175-8
Number of pages4
ISSN0284-1851
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 1988
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Angiocardiography
  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Cardiac Output
  • Dye Dilution Technique
  • Female
  • Heart
  • Heart Ventricles
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Radionuclide Imaging
  • Stroke Volume
  • Thermodilution
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and left ventricular ejection fraction. Radionuclide cardiography compared with left ventricular cardioangiography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this