Abstract
The patent foramen ovale (PFO), present in 25% of the population, can cause paradoxical embolism and stroke. Transcatheter PFO closure is the gold standard for recurrent embolism with significant inter-atrial shunting, with recent trials confirming its superiority in reducing ischemic stroke recurrence over medical therapy. However, device-related thrombosis remains a concern, posing risks of systemic embolism and neurological events. Optimal post-closure antithrombotic management, including the choice and duration of therapy, remains unclear. Recommendations suggest transient dual antiplatelet therapy followed by long-term single therapy, but robust evidence is lacking, especially regarding device neo-endothelization timelines. Current studies often lack long-term follow-up, leaving gaps in understanding the incidence and prevention of thrombosis. Future research is crucial to provide evidence-based guidance and refine personalized treatment strategies for better outcomes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 2037-2047 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| ISSN | 1522-1946 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2025 |
Keywords
- antithrombotic
- closure
- patent foramen ovale
- strategy
- transcatheter
- treatment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Navigating the uncertainties of antithrombotic therapy After transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure: A Comprehensive Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS