Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: updated recommendations for patient selection and monitoring

Ludwig Kappos, David Bates, Gilles Edan, Mefkûre Eraksoy, Antonio Garcia-Merino, Nikolaos Grigoriadis, Hans-Peter Hartung, Eva Havrdová, Jan Hillert, Reinhard Hohlfeld, Marcelo Kremenchutzky, Olivier Lyon-Caen, Ariel Miller, Carlo Pozzilli, Mads Ravnborg, Takahiko Saida, Christian Sindic, Karl Vass, David B Clifford, Stephen HauserEugene O Major, Paul W O'Connor, Howard L Weiner, Michel Clanet, Ralf Gold, Hans H Hirsch, Ernst-Wilhelm Radü, Per Soelberg Sørensen, John King

259 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Natalizumab, a highly specific α4-integrin antagonist, is approved for treatment of patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). It is generally recommended for individuals who have not responded to a currently available first-line disease-modifying therapy or who have very active disease. The expected benefits of natalizumab treatment have to be weighed against risks, especially the rare but serious adverse event of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. In this Review, we revisit and update previous recommendations on natalizumab for treatment of patients with RRMS, based on additional long-term follow-up of clinical studies and post-marketing observations, including appropriate patient selection and management recommendations.
Original languageEnglish
JournalLancet neurology
Volume10
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)745-58
Number of pages14
ISSN1474-4422
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Drug Monitoring
  • Humans
  • Integrin alpha4beta1
  • Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal
  • Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
  • Patient Selection
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: updated recommendations for patient selection and monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this