Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Multiple Testing, Cut-Point Optimization, and Signs of Publication Bias in Prognostic FDG-PET Imaging Studies of Head and Neck and Lung Cancer: A Review and Meta-Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  1. Treatment Response Biomarkers in Asthma and COPD

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

  2. Effect of Liraglutide on Vascular Inflammation Evaluated by [64Cu]DOTATATE

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. MRI of the Entire Spinal Cord-Worth the While or Waste of Time? A Retrospective Study of 74 Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Optimal Insertion Depth for Nasal Mid-Turbinate and Nasopharyngeal Swabs

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Distant metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx and larynx: a population-based DAHANCA study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Altered brown fat thermoregulation and enhanced cold-induced thermogenesis in young, healthy, winter-swimming men

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Effect of liraglutide on expression of inflammatory genes in type 2 diabetes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was proposed as prognostic marker in radiotherapy. Various uptake metrics and cut points were used, potentially leading to inflated effect estimates. Here, we performed a meta-analysis and systematic review of the prognostic value of pretreatment FDG-PET in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with tests for publication bias. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and local control was extracted or derived from the 57 studies included. Test for publication bias was performed, and the number of statistical tests and cut-point optimizations were registered. Eggers regression related to correlation of SUVmax with OS/DFS yielded p = 0.08/p = 0.02 for HNSCC and p < 0.001/p = 0.014 for NSCLC. No outcomes showed significant correlation with SUVmax, when adjusting for publication bias effect, whereas all four showed a correlation in the conventional meta-analysis. The number of statistical tests and cut points were high with no indication of improvement over time. Our analysis showed significant evidence of publication bias leading to inflated estimates of the prognostic value of SUVmax. We suggest that improved management of these complexities, including predefined statistical analysis plans, are critical for a reliable assessment of FDG-PET.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDiagnostics
Volume10
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)1030
Number of pages1
ISSN2075-4418
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020

ID: 62406283