Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

MRI assessment of early response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study applying MRI at weeks 0, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Use of composite outcomes facilitate core outcome set uptake in rheumatoid arthritis trials

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. How do people with rheumatoid arthritis experience participation in a smoking cessation trial: a qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Adherence to Treat-to-Target Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Associated Factors: Data from the International RA BIODAM Cohort

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVES: To identify the first time point of an MRI-verified response to certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS: Forty-one patients with active RA despite disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy were randomised 2:1 to CZP (CZP loading dose 400 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 0-4; CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 6-16) or placebo→CZP (placebo at weeks 0-2; CZP loading dose at weeks 2-6; CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks at weeks 8-16). Contrast-enhanced MRI of one hand and wrist was acquired at baseline (week 0) and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16. All six time points were read simultaneously, blinded to time, using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials RA MRI scoring system. Primary outcome was change in synovitis score in the CZP group; secondary outcomes were change in bone oedema (osteitis) and erosion scores and clinical outcome measures.

RESULTS: Forty patients were treated (27 CZP, 13 placebo→CZP), and 36 (24 CZP, 12 placebo→CZP) completed week 16. In the CZP group, there were significant reductions from baseline synovitis (Hodges-Lehmann estimate of median change, -1.5, p=0.049) and osteitis scores (-2.5, p=0.031) at week 16. Numerical, but statistically insignificant, MRI inflammation reductions were observed at weeks 1-2 in the CZP group. No significant change was seen in bone erosion score. Improvements across all clinical outcomes were seen in the CZP group.

CONCLUSIONS: CZP reduced MRI synovitis and osteitis scores at week 16, despite small sample size and the technical challenge of reading six time points simultaneously. This study provides essential information on optimal MRI timing for subsequent trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01235598.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Issue number74
Pages (from-to)1156-1163
Number of pages8
ISSN0003-4967
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

COPECARE

ID: 45111311