Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Monocular and binocular end-points after epiretinal membrane surgery and their correlation to patient-reported outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{281f2bebb6b64706aa2603377f762047,
title = "Monocular and binocular end-points after epiretinal membrane surgery and their correlation to patient-reported outcomes",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This study evaluates current available endpoints for epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery and examine their correlation to patient reported outcomes (PRO).METHODS: Retrospective study including 38 eyes of 38 patients who underwent cataract extraction and subsequent vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM. The fellow eye was phakic with good visual acuity. The registered outcomes were monocular and binocular visual acuity, stereoacuity, M-chart metamorphopsia score, aniseikonia and aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR). Two questionnaires were completed: the convergence insufficiency symptom survey and Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39).RESULTS: Median total aniseikonia was 11% (range 0-35). There was a statistically significant correlation between the mean total M-chart score of the study eye and VFQ-Near (Spearman rho: VFQ-Near: -0.54, p < 0.01). There was no correlation between the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the project eye, binocular BCVA, stereoacuity, ATR or mean total aniseikonia and PRO (Spearman p-values > 0.05). There was no correlation between mean total aniseikonia and mean total M-chart score (Spearman rho: 0.21 p = 0.26). There was a large variation between the mean total M-chart scores and questionnaire results.CONCLUSION: The mean total M-chart score is currently the best end-points to predict PRO of ERM surgery; however, it is possible to have high M-chart values and have no visual complaints.",
keywords = "aniseikonia, ERM, patient reported outcomes, stereoacuity",
author = "Therese Krarup and Ivan Nisted and Ulrik Christensen and Kiilgaard, {Jens Folke} and {la Cour}, Morten",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/aos.14449",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "716--725",
journal = "Acta Ophthalmologica",
issn = "1755-375X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monocular and binocular end-points after epiretinal membrane surgery and their correlation to patient-reported outcomes

AU - Krarup, Therese

AU - Nisted, Ivan

AU - Christensen, Ulrik

AU - Kiilgaard, Jens Folke

AU - la Cour, Morten

N1 - © 2020 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - PURPOSE: This study evaluates current available endpoints for epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery and examine their correlation to patient reported outcomes (PRO).METHODS: Retrospective study including 38 eyes of 38 patients who underwent cataract extraction and subsequent vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM. The fellow eye was phakic with good visual acuity. The registered outcomes were monocular and binocular visual acuity, stereoacuity, M-chart metamorphopsia score, aniseikonia and aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR). Two questionnaires were completed: the convergence insufficiency symptom survey and Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39).RESULTS: Median total aniseikonia was 11% (range 0-35). There was a statistically significant correlation between the mean total M-chart score of the study eye and VFQ-Near (Spearman rho: VFQ-Near: -0.54, p < 0.01). There was no correlation between the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the project eye, binocular BCVA, stereoacuity, ATR or mean total aniseikonia and PRO (Spearman p-values > 0.05). There was no correlation between mean total aniseikonia and mean total M-chart score (Spearman rho: 0.21 p = 0.26). There was a large variation between the mean total M-chart scores and questionnaire results.CONCLUSION: The mean total M-chart score is currently the best end-points to predict PRO of ERM surgery; however, it is possible to have high M-chart values and have no visual complaints.

AB - PURPOSE: This study evaluates current available endpoints for epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery and examine their correlation to patient reported outcomes (PRO).METHODS: Retrospective study including 38 eyes of 38 patients who underwent cataract extraction and subsequent vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM. The fellow eye was phakic with good visual acuity. The registered outcomes were monocular and binocular visual acuity, stereoacuity, M-chart metamorphopsia score, aniseikonia and aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR). Two questionnaires were completed: the convergence insufficiency symptom survey and Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-39).RESULTS: Median total aniseikonia was 11% (range 0-35). There was a statistically significant correlation between the mean total M-chart score of the study eye and VFQ-Near (Spearman rho: VFQ-Near: -0.54, p < 0.01). There was no correlation between the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the project eye, binocular BCVA, stereoacuity, ATR or mean total aniseikonia and PRO (Spearman p-values > 0.05). There was no correlation between mean total aniseikonia and mean total M-chart score (Spearman rho: 0.21 p = 0.26). There was a large variation between the mean total M-chart scores and questionnaire results.CONCLUSION: The mean total M-chart score is currently the best end-points to predict PRO of ERM surgery; however, it is possible to have high M-chart values and have no visual complaints.

KW - aniseikonia

KW - ERM

KW - patient reported outcomes

KW - stereoacuity

U2 - 10.1111/aos.14449

DO - 10.1111/aos.14449

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32323909

VL - 98

SP - 716

EP - 725

JO - Acta Ophthalmologica

JF - Acta Ophthalmologica

SN - 1755-375X

IS - 7

ER -

ID: 59811019