Men's reflections on participating in cancer rehabilitation: A systematic review of qualitative studies 2000-2013

C. Handberg*, C. V. Nielsen, K. Lomborg

*Corresponding author for this work
25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper aims to report on a systematic review of qualitative studies on men's reflections on participating in cancer rehabilitation. Nine databases were systematically searched to identify qualitative papers published between 2000 and 2013. Papers were selected by pre-defined inclusion criteria and subsequently critically appraised. Key themes were extracted and synthesised. Fifteen papers were selected and represented. Four central themes were identified in the analytical process: 'changed life perspective', 'the masculinity factor', 'a desire to get back to normal' and 'the meaning of work'. Six peripheral themes were identified: 'the meaning of context', 'music', 'physical training', 'religion', 'humour' and 'the unmentionable'. The themes were synthesised into an integrative model representing men's reflections on participating in cancer rehabilitation. We conclude that existing qualitative literature offers insight into men's reflections on cancer rehabilitation and highlights the interrelationship between men's reflections on their changed life perspective, masculinity, orientation towards a normal life and getting back to work. Further research-based knowledge is needed to explore (1) the underlying causes and patterns of the men's needs, preferences and choices in rehabilitation; and (2) the health professional perspective on male cancer rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer Care
Volume23
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)159-172
Number of pages14
ISSN0961-5423
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Gender
  • Male
  • Qualitative research
  • Rehabilitation
  • Review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Men's reflections on participating in cancer rehabilitation: A systematic review of qualitative studies 2000-2013'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this