Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in phase II cardiac rehabilitation attendance: A Convergent Mixed Methods study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{48b458566f094608ae8b49de966b42d3,
title = "Mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in phase II cardiac rehabilitation attendance: A Convergent Mixed Methods study",
abstract = "AIM: To explore the extent to which the qualitative and quantitative data converge and explain mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance.BACKGROUND: Social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance has been a recognized problem for many years. However, to date the mechanisms driving these inequalities are still not fully understood.DESIGN: The study was designed as a convergent mixed methods study.METHODS: From March 2015 - March 2016, patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome to two Danish regional hospitals were included in a quantitative prospective observational study (N=302). Qualitative interview informants (N=24) were sampled from the quantitative study population and half brought a close relative (N=12) for dyadic interviews. Interviews were conducted from August 2015 to February 2016. Integrated analyses were conducted in joint displays by merging the quantitative and qualitative findings.RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative findings primarily confirmed and expanded each other; however, discordant results were also evident. Integrated analyses identified socially differentiated lifestyles, health beliefs, travel barriers and self-efficacy as potential drivers of social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation.CONCLUSION: Our study adds empirical evidence regarding how a mixed methods study can be used to obtain an understanding of complex healthcare problems. The study provides new knowledge concerning the mechanisms driving social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance. To prevent social inequality, cardiac rehabilitation should be accommodated to patients with a history of unhealthy behaviour and low self-efficacy. Additionally, the rehabilitation programme should be offered in locations not requiring a long commute. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
author = "Maria Pedersen and Dorthe Overgaard and Ingelise Andersen and Marie Baastrup and Ingrid Egerod",
note = "This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/jan.13715",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "2181--95",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in phase II cardiac rehabilitation attendance

T2 - A Convergent Mixed Methods study

AU - Pedersen, Maria

AU - Overgaard, Dorthe

AU - Andersen, Ingelise

AU - Baastrup, Marie

AU - Egerod, Ingrid

N1 - This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - AIM: To explore the extent to which the qualitative and quantitative data converge and explain mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance.BACKGROUND: Social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance has been a recognized problem for many years. However, to date the mechanisms driving these inequalities are still not fully understood.DESIGN: The study was designed as a convergent mixed methods study.METHODS: From March 2015 - March 2016, patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome to two Danish regional hospitals were included in a quantitative prospective observational study (N=302). Qualitative interview informants (N=24) were sampled from the quantitative study population and half brought a close relative (N=12) for dyadic interviews. Interviews were conducted from August 2015 to February 2016. Integrated analyses were conducted in joint displays by merging the quantitative and qualitative findings.RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative findings primarily confirmed and expanded each other; however, discordant results were also evident. Integrated analyses identified socially differentiated lifestyles, health beliefs, travel barriers and self-efficacy as potential drivers of social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation.CONCLUSION: Our study adds empirical evidence regarding how a mixed methods study can be used to obtain an understanding of complex healthcare problems. The study provides new knowledge concerning the mechanisms driving social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance. To prevent social inequality, cardiac rehabilitation should be accommodated to patients with a history of unhealthy behaviour and low self-efficacy. Additionally, the rehabilitation programme should be offered in locations not requiring a long commute. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AB - AIM: To explore the extent to which the qualitative and quantitative data converge and explain mechanisms and drivers of social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance.BACKGROUND: Social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance has been a recognized problem for many years. However, to date the mechanisms driving these inequalities are still not fully understood.DESIGN: The study was designed as a convergent mixed methods study.METHODS: From March 2015 - March 2016, patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome to two Danish regional hospitals were included in a quantitative prospective observational study (N=302). Qualitative interview informants (N=24) were sampled from the quantitative study population and half brought a close relative (N=12) for dyadic interviews. Interviews were conducted from August 2015 to February 2016. Integrated analyses were conducted in joint displays by merging the quantitative and qualitative findings.RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative findings primarily confirmed and expanded each other; however, discordant results were also evident. Integrated analyses identified socially differentiated lifestyles, health beliefs, travel barriers and self-efficacy as potential drivers of social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation.CONCLUSION: Our study adds empirical evidence regarding how a mixed methods study can be used to obtain an understanding of complex healthcare problems. The study provides new knowledge concerning the mechanisms driving social inequality in cardiac rehabilitation attendance. To prevent social inequality, cardiac rehabilitation should be accommodated to patients with a history of unhealthy behaviour and low self-efficacy. Additionally, the rehabilitation programme should be offered in locations not requiring a long commute. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1111/jan.13715

DO - 10.1111/jan.13715

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29772607

VL - 74

SP - 2181

EP - 2195

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 9

ER -

ID: 54646716