Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
E-pub ahead of print

Measuring aniseikonia tolerance range for stereoacuity - a tool for the refractive surgeon

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Monocular and binocular end-points after epiretinal membrane surgery and their correlation to patient-reported outcomes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. The tolerance of anisometropia

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Low physical activity and higher use of screen devices are associated with myopia at the age of 16-17 years in the CCC2000 Eye Study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Loss of retinal tension and permanent decrease in retinal function: a new porcine model of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Monocular and binocular end-points after epiretinal membrane surgery and their correlation to patient-reported outcomes

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Simulation of advanced cataract surgery - validation of a newly developed test

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Tumour control probability after Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanomas

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Genetic Biomarkers in Melanoma of the Ocular Region: What the Medical Oncologist Should Know

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

OBJECTIVE: No method exists to measure aniseikonia tolerance in stereoacuity. The brain can compensate for 2%-3% aniseikonia (i.e. 2-3 dioptres of anisometropia) without impairing stereoacuity; however, a substantial proportion of anisometropic patients experience problems caused by disruptions of sensory fusion due to surgically induced aniseikonia. We hypothesized that individual differences in tolerance to aniseikonia exist and sought to develop a method to measure aniseikonia tolerance.

METHODS: A total of 21 eye-healthy phakic individuals older than 50 years of age and 11 patients awaiting clear lens extraction were included. Patients were tested with best corrected near and distance visual acuity, cover/uncover test, eye dominance test, stereoacuity threshold (TNO test), slit lamp examination and ocular coherence tomography. The stereoacuity threshold was determined with aniseikonia induced by different size lenses ranging from 1% to 9% magnification of both eyes in increments of 1%. The aniseikonia tolerance range (ATR) was defined as the percentage aniseikonia in which the stereoacuity threshold was maintained.

RESULTS: We examined 32 patients with a median age of 65 (95% CI: 62-66 years), CDVA better than 6/7.5 (0.1 logMAR), and median near visual acuity better than 6/6 (0.0 logMAR). The median stereoacuity threshold was 60 arcsec (maximum 30, minimum 120). We observed large inter-individual differences in ATR: 6/31 (19%) participants had an ATR of ≤1%, 1/31 (3%) had an ATR of 1-5%, 7/31 (22%) had an ATR of 5-10%, and 17/31 (54%) had an ATR of >10%.

CONCLUSION: We present a reliable method for measuring the amount of aniseikonia that a person can tolerate without impairing stereopsis. We report large inter-individual differences in tolerance of aniseikonia.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Ophthalmologica
ISSN1755-375X
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jun 2020

    Research areas

  • ametropia, aniseikonia, aniseikonia tolerance, anisometropia, cataract surgery, rule of thumb, size glasses

ID: 61058427