Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Measurements of cardiac output obtained with transesophageal echocardiography and pulmonary artery thermodilution are not interchangeable

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Continuing professional development (CPD) for anesthesiologists: a systematic review protocol

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Handling oxygenation targets in ICU patients with COVID-19-Protocol and statistical analysis plan in the HOT-COVID trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Hypophosphataemia is common in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxia: the COVID STEROID randomised, placebo-controlled trial

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  1. Cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Dual-energy CT

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is increasingly becoming an integrated tool for circulatory evaluation in the intensive care unit and the operating room. Therefore, it is imperative to know the reproducibility of measurements obtained by echocardiography. In this study, a comparison of cardiac output (CO) measurements obtained with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution (TD) was carried out to test the precision, accuracy and trending ability of CO measurements obtained with TEE.

METHODS: Twenty-five patients completed the study. Each patient was placed in the following successive positions: supine, head-down tilt, head-up tilt, supine, supine with phenylephrine administration, pace heart rate 80 beats per minute (bpm), pace heart rate 110 bpm. TEE CO and PAC CO were measured simultaneously. The agreement was analysed by Bland-Altman plots, and to assess trending ability, a polar plot was constructed.

RESULTS: Both methods showed an acceptable precision 8% (PAC TD) and 16% (TEE). In comparison with PAC TD, the TEE was associated with a bias of -0.22 l/minute [95% confidence interval: -0.54; 0.10], wide limits of agreement (-1.73 l/minute; 1.29 l/minute), a percentage error of 38.6% and a trending ability with a radial degree of 53.6°, corresponding to a poor trending ability.

CONCLUSION: In comparison, CO measurements obtained with TEE and PAC TD had wide limits of agreement, a larger percentage error than would be expected from the precision of the two methods, and a poor trending ability. Thus, TEE is not interchangeable with PAC TD for measuring CO.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume58
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)80-8
Number of pages9
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

    Research areas

  • Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Anesthesia, General, Cardiac Output, Coronary Artery Bypass, Echocardiography, Transesophageal, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Multiple Organ Failure, Phenylephrine, Posture, Pulmonary Artery, Reproducibility of Results, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Thermodilution, Vasoconstrictor Agents

ID: 44893072