TY - JOUR
T1 - Maternal age and body mass index and risk of labor dystocia after spontaneous labor onset among nulliparous women
T2 - A clinical prediction model
AU - Nathan, Nina Olsén
AU - Bergholt, Thomas
AU - Sejling, Christoffer
AU - Ersbøll, Anne Schøjdt
AU - Ekelund, Kim
AU - Gerds, Thomas Alexander
AU - Gam, Christiane Bourgin Folke
AU - Rode, Line
AU - Hegaard, Hanne Kristine
N1 - Copyright: © 2024 Nathan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Obstetrics research has predominantly focused on the management and identification of factors associated with labor dystocia. Despite these efforts, clinicians currently lack the necessary tools to effectively predict a woman's risk of experiencing labor dystocia. Therefore, the objective of this study was to create a predictive model for labor dystocia.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population included nulliparous women with a single baby in the cephalic presentation in spontaneous labor at term. With a cohort-based registry design utilizing data from the Copenhagen Pregnancy Cohort and the Danish Medical Birth Registry, we included women who had given birth from 2014 to 2020 at Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Logistic regression analysis, augmented by a super learner algorithm, was employed to construct the prediction model with candidate predictors pre-selected based on clinical reasoning and existing evidence. These predictors included maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, height, gestational age, physical activity, self-reported medical condition, WHO-5 score, and fertility treatment. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for discriminative capacity and Brier score for model calibration.RESULTS: A total of 12,445 women involving 5,525 events of labor dystocia (44%) were included. All candidate predictors were retained in the final model, which demonstrated discriminative ability with an AUC of 62.3% (95% CI:60.7-64.0) and Brier score of 0.24.CONCLUSIONS: Our model represents an initial advancement in the prediction of labor dystocia utilizing readily available information obtainable upon admission in active labor. As a next step further model development and external testing across other populations is warranted. With time a well-performing model may be a step towards facilitating risk stratification and the development of a user-friendly online tool for clinicians.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Obstetrics research has predominantly focused on the management and identification of factors associated with labor dystocia. Despite these efforts, clinicians currently lack the necessary tools to effectively predict a woman's risk of experiencing labor dystocia. Therefore, the objective of this study was to create a predictive model for labor dystocia.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population included nulliparous women with a single baby in the cephalic presentation in spontaneous labor at term. With a cohort-based registry design utilizing data from the Copenhagen Pregnancy Cohort and the Danish Medical Birth Registry, we included women who had given birth from 2014 to 2020 at Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Logistic regression analysis, augmented by a super learner algorithm, was employed to construct the prediction model with candidate predictors pre-selected based on clinical reasoning and existing evidence. These predictors included maternal age, pre-pregnancy body mass index, height, gestational age, physical activity, self-reported medical condition, WHO-5 score, and fertility treatment. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for discriminative capacity and Brier score for model calibration.RESULTS: A total of 12,445 women involving 5,525 events of labor dystocia (44%) were included. All candidate predictors were retained in the final model, which demonstrated discriminative ability with an AUC of 62.3% (95% CI:60.7-64.0) and Brier score of 0.24.CONCLUSIONS: Our model represents an initial advancement in the prediction of labor dystocia utilizing readily available information obtainable upon admission in active labor. As a next step further model development and external testing across other populations is warranted. With time a well-performing model may be a step towards facilitating risk stratification and the development of a user-friendly online tool for clinicians.
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Dystocia/epidemiology
KW - Adult
KW - Body Mass Index
KW - Maternal Age
KW - Parity
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Denmark/epidemiology
KW - ROC Curve
KW - Labor Onset
KW - Registries
KW - Gestational Age
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203383682&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0308018
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0308018
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39240838
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 19
SP - e0308018
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 9
M1 - e0308018
ER -