Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a multidisciplinary team approach managing infections of complex aortic endografts, focusing on conservative treatment as an alternative to surgical explantation in selected cases. This was a retrospective, monocentric study conducted at Bordeaux University Hospital.
METHODS: From January 2018 to July 2024, we reviewed cases of complex aortic endografts (chimney endovascular aortic repair [ChEVAR], fenestrated endovascular aortic repair [BEVAR], and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair [FEVAR]) infections, managed by our multidisciplinary vascular infection team (MDVIT). The primary end points were in-hospital mortality and overall survival. Secondary end points included complications during hospitalization and follow-up.
RESULTS: All 11 cases of complex endografts infections managed by our MDVIT were scrutinized, infected FEVARS n = 10 and infected ChEVAR n = 1. The mean age was 72 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (7 patients) managed with conservative treatment with antimicrobial therapy ± percutaneous drainage, and group B (4 patients) undergoing surgical treatment due to complications. Group A demonstrated infection remission in 6/7 patients (86%) with antimicrobial therapy. One patient from group A required emergent surgery due to sepsis and was reassigned to group B. All patients in group B presented with complications such as aorto-duodenal fistulas n = 3 and pseudoaneurysms n = 1; 3 underwent graft explantations, and one underwent sacotomy and duodenal fistula repair without graft removal. The overall in-hospital mortality was 9%, and the mean follow-up was 15 months (range 3-37). The overall survival was 82% at 1 year. Long-term vascular complications were limited, and suppressive antimicrobial therapy was effective with high rate of remission of infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary team management enables a tailored approach to complex aortic endograft infections. Conservative treatment was first-line treatment, but for cases complicated by fistula or pseudoaneurysm surgical explantation was performed. Antimicrobial grafts and visceral debranching played a pivotal role in the surgical cases. This study highlights the importance of multidisciplinary decision-making and follow-up to optimize patient outcomes and inform future multicenter research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Annals of Vascular Surgery |
| Volume | 120 |
| Pages (from-to) | 361-372 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISSN | 0890-5096 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2025 |
Keywords
- Humans
- Prosthesis-Related Infections/mortality
- Retrospective Studies
- Aged
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis/adverse effects
- Male
- Female
- Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects
- Patient Care Team
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
- Treatment Outcome
- Aged, 80 and over
- Time Factors
- Middle Aged
- Hospital Mortality
- Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects
- Risk Factors
- Conservative Treatment/adverse effects
- Device Removal/adverse effects
- Drainage/adverse effects
- France
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Management of Complex Aortic Endograft Infection by a Multidisciplinary Team'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS