Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets in Patients With COVID-19 in the ICU: A Secondary Bayesian Analysis of the Handling Oxygenation Targets in COVID-19 Trial

Frederik M Nielsen*, Thomas L Klitgaard, Anders Granholm, Theis Lange, Anders Perner, Olav L Schjørring, Bodil S Rasmussen

*Corresponding author for this work
2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Handling Oxygenation Targets in COVID-19 (HOT-COVID) trial, a Pao2 target of 60 mm Hg compared with 90 mm Hg resulted in more days alive without life support at 90 days in adults in the ICU with COVID-19 and hypoxemia. The trial was stopped after enrolling 726 of 780 planned patients because of slow recruitment. Herein, we present the preplanned Bayesian analysis of the HOT-COVID trial.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the probabilities of any benefits and of clinically relevant benefits resulting from a Pao2 target of 60 mm Hg vs 90 mm Hg in adult patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia in the ICU and does heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) exist according to selected baseline characteristics?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed days alive without life support and 90-day mortality in the HOT-COVID intention-to-treat population (n = 697) using Bayesian general linear models to assess probabilities for benefit or harm, including clinically relevant benefits defined as > 1 day alive without life support and > 2 percentage points lower 90-day mortality. HTE was evaluated based on baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, Pao2 to Fio2 ratio, norepinephrine doses, and lactate concentrations.

RESULTS: The mean difference in days alive without life support was 5.7 days (95% credible interval, 0.2-11.2), with a 95.2% probability of clinically relevant benefit and a 98.0% probability of any benefit from the lower Pao2 target. The risk difference in 90-day mortality was -4.6 percentage points (95% credible interval, -11.8 to 2.6 percentage points), with a 76.5% probability of a clinically relevant benefit from the lower target. HTE analyses revealed potential interaction with baseline norepinephrine dose and lactate concentrations for both outcomes.

INTERPRETATION: In patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia in the ICU, we found a high probability for a clinically relevant benefit of targeting a Pao2 of 60 mm Hg vs 90 mm Hg on number of days alive without life support.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04425031; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Original languageEnglish
JournalChest
Volume167
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)757-767
Number of pages11
ISSN0012-3692
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2025

Keywords

  • Bayesian analysis
  • COVID-19
  • hypoxia
  • ICUs
  • oxygen inhalation therapy
  • respiratory insufficiency
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods
  • Hypoxia/etiology
  • Male
  • Oxygen/metabolism
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Female
  • Aged
  • COVID-19/therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lower or Higher Oxygenation Targets in Patients With COVID-19 in the ICU: A Secondary Bayesian Analysis of the Handling Oxygenation Targets in COVID-19 Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this