Research
Print page Print page
Switch language
The Capital Region of Denmark - a part of Copenhagen University Hospital
Published

Long-term mortality in the Intermediate care after emergency abdominal surgery (InCare) trial - a post-hoc follow-up study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  1. Cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective population-based cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Clinical considerations for reposition of a dislocated hip: A qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Inflammatory response, fluid balance and outcome in emergency high-risk abdominal surgery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  4. Pre-operative epidural analgesia in hip fracture patients - A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Research output: Contribution to journalReviewpeer-review

  1. Clinical considerations for reposition of a dislocated hip: A qualitative study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  2. Assessment of assumptions of statistical analysis methods in randomised clinical trials: the what and how

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  3. Considerations on the strengths and limitations of using disease-related mortality as an outcome in clinical research

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

  4. Timing of surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international prospective cohort study

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

View graph of relations

Background: Patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery are at high risk of post-operative complications. Although post-operative treatment at an intermediate care unit may improve early outcome, there is a lack of studies on the long-term effects of such therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effect of intermediate care versus standard surgical ward care on mortality in the Intermediate Care After Emergency Abdominal Surgery (InCare) trial. Methods: We included adult patients undergoing emergency major laparoscopy or laparotomy with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of 10 or more, who participated in the InCare trial from October 2010 to November 2012. In the InCare trial, patients were randomized to either post-operative intermediate care or standard surgical ward care. The primary outcome was time to death within 6 years after surgery. We assessed mortality with Coxregression analysis. Results: A total of 286 patients were included. The all-cause 6-year landmark mortality was 52.8% (76 of 144 patients) in the intermediate care group and 47.9% (68 of 142 patients) in the ward care group. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality risk between the two groups (hazard ratio 1.06 (95% confidence interval 0.76-1.47), P =.73). Conclusion: We found no statistically significant difference in 6-year mortality between patients randomized to post-operative intermediate care or ward care after emergency abdominal surgery. However, we detected an absolute mortality risk reduction of 5% in favour of ward care, possibly due to random error.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Volume64
Issue number8
Pages (from-to)1100-1105
Number of pages6
ISSN0001-5172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

Bibliographical note

© 2020 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 59910378